public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@tglx.de
Subject: Re: [patch] Printk kernel version in WARN_ON
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 20:42:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071117194240.GD8568@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071117113501.5e3e0d43@laptopd505.fenrus.org>

On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 11:35:01AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:46:52 -0800
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > > by ... not too much at least, gcc ought to be quite good at merging
> > > same-strings into one, so it's just one extra pointer argument
> > > 
> > 
> > I think I knew that.  At 1000 callsites.
> 
> ok so how about putting the same into dump_stack() instead? (see below)
> added bonus is that it's now present for all dumps that use
> dump_stack(), not just WARN_ON()
> (the format I copied from the exact line used by oopses)

This solved the "zillion files being rebuild" issue I mentioned.
So from that angle it is better.

And I notice you use the namespace aware helpers to access the
kernelrelease string - I assume this is better than direct use
of UTS_RELEASE.

	Sam

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-17 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-17 18:15 [patch] Printk kernel version in WARN_ON Arjan van de Ven
2007-11-17 18:27 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-17 18:39   ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-11-17 18:46     ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-17 19:35       ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-11-17 19:42         ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2007-11-21 12:51           ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-18  0:42         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-18  0:57           ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-18  1:04             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-18 17:18             ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-11-17 19:28 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-11-17 23:02 ` Denys Vlasenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071117194240.GD8568@uranus.ravnborg.org \
    --to=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@tglx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox