From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Fix UML broken (was Re: User Mode Linux still broken in 2.6.23.1)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:14:55 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711190114.55604.rob@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071118213203.GA5696@uranus.ravnborg.org>
On Sunday 18 November 2007 15:32:03 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 02:17:49PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 November 2007 12:53:57 Jeff Dike wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:00:22PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > > I wasn't cc'd, and missed it. I'd like to test this, do you have a
> > > > link? (Or a bit more specificity than "a few weeks ago"?)
> > >
> > > Here are the three patches:
> > >
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=119342916329510&w=2
> >
> > Doesn't contain a patch.
>
> Took me one minute to locate PATCH 1 + 2:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=119342916429513&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=119342916229500&w=2
>
> Maybe this helps you.
Same problem as previous message: they don't apply to 2.6.23. (I tried both
2.6.23 and 2.6.23.8, just to be sure.)
I don't suppose putting #ifndef guards around whatever sparc.h file hasn't got
them is a reasonable hack to get this worked around during 2.6.23.x?
Rob
--
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-19 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-04 4:51 User Mode Linux still broken in 2.6.23.1 Rob Landley
2007-11-14 18:54 ` Greg KH
2007-11-15 5:58 ` Rob Landley
2007-11-15 6:02 ` Greg KH
2007-11-15 20:57 ` Rob Landley
2007-11-15 21:06 ` Greg KH
2007-11-16 3:08 ` [Patch] Fix UML broken (was Re: User Mode Linux still broken in 2.6.23.1) WANG Cong
2007-11-16 5:01 ` Rob Landley
2007-11-16 7:15 ` Greg KH
2007-11-16 15:51 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-16 16:53 ` Greg KH
2007-11-16 22:00 ` Rob Landley
2007-11-17 18:53 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-18 20:17 ` Rob Landley
2007-11-18 21:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-11-19 7:14 ` Rob Landley [this message]
2007-11-16 18:00 ` Rob Landley
2007-11-16 15:12 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-16 15:26 ` WANG Cong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200711190114.55604.rob@landley.net \
--to=rob@landley.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox