From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: SCSI breakage on non-cache coherent architectures
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:32:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071119123240.GA12494@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1195450523.7022.37.camel@pasglop>
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 04:35:23PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> The other one I'm hitting now is that the SCSI layer nowadays embeds the
'nowadays'? It has always been so.
> sense_buffer inside the scsi_cmnd structure without any kind of
> alignment whatsoever. I've been hitting irregulary is a crash on SCSI command
> completion that seems to be related to corruption of the "request"
> pointer in struct scsi_cmnd and I think it might be the cause.
> I'm now trying to setup a proper repro-case.
What other drivers do is DMA to their own allocation and then memcpy to
the sense buffer.
There is a movement to allocate the sense data as its own sg list, but
I don't think that patch has even been posted yet.
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-19 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-19 5:35 SCSI breakage on non-cache coherent architectures Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-19 8:38 ` David Miller
2007-11-19 19:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-19 22:31 ` David Miller
2007-11-20 0:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-20 0:46 ` David Miller
2007-11-20 0:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-20 0:57 ` David Miller
2007-11-20 2:10 ` Roland Dreier
2007-11-20 2:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-20 3:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-20 19:35 ` James Bottomley
2007-11-20 8:29 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2007-11-20 14:36 ` James Bottomley
2007-11-20 20:05 ` Roland Dreier
2007-11-20 21:10 ` James Bottomley
2007-11-20 22:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-20 23:09 ` James Bottomley
2007-11-19 12:32 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2007-11-19 15:09 ` James Bottomley
2007-11-19 19:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-19 19:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-19 19:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-19 21:43 ` Roland Dreier
2007-11-19 21:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071119123240.GA12494@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox