Re: [RFC 5/7] LTTng instrumentation mm

Dave Hansen
2007-11-19T19:44:29Z

On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 14:00 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > Well, using page_to_pfn turns out to be ugly in markers (and in
> > printks) then. Depending on the architecture, it will result in either
> > an unsigned long (x86_64) or an unsigned int (i386), which corresponds
>
> Well, it's signed long and signed int, but the point is still valid.

the result of page_to_pfn() may end up being signed in practice, but it
never needs to be. Just cast it to an unsigned long and make it
consistent everywhere.

-- Dave