From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wait_task_stopped: pass correct exit_code to wait_noreap_copyout
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:16:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071120001624.83c7fbce.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1195545322.14510.170.camel@wing-commander>
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:55:22 +0000 Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 22:43 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:13:24 +0000 Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In wait_task_stopped() exit_code already contains the right value for
> > > the si_status member of siginfo, and this is simply set in the non
> > > WNOWAIT case.
> > >
> > > Pass it unchanged to wait_noreap_copyout(); we would only need to
> > > shift it and add 0x7f if we were returning it in the user status field
> > > and that isn't used for any function that permits WNOWAIT.
> > >
> > Is this bug visible to userspace? If so, I'm surprised that none of the
> > various testsuites (which like to exercise this sort of interface) has
> > detected it.
> >
> Absolutely; if you call waitid() with a stopped or traced process,
> you'll get the signal in siginfo.si_status as expected -- however if you
> call waitid(WNOWAIT) at the same time, you'll get the signal << 8 | 0x7f
>
hm, OK. Well I guess I'll stick a for-2.6.23 tag on this as well as
queueing it for 2.6.24.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-20 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-18 9:13 [PATCH] wait_task_stopped: pass correct exit_code to wait_noreap_copyout Scott James Remnant
2007-11-20 6:43 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-20 7:55 ` Scott James Remnant
2007-11-20 8:16 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071120001624.83c7fbce.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=scott@ubuntu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox