From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759612AbXKTM2y (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:28:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757186AbXKTM2q (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:28:46 -0500 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]:49493 "EHLO e36.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757116AbXKTM2p (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:28:45 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:11:19 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri To: Damien Wyart Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7 Message-ID: <20071120124119.GA2154@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20071119151756.GA25446@elte.hu> <20071120112459.GA2884@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071120112459.GA2884@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 12:24:59PM +0100, Damien Wyart wrote: > Testing sched-cfs-v2.6.24-rc3-v24.patch on top of 2.6.24-rc3-git1 > (ignored the two "already applied" messages coming from git1 commits), > I get a 1.00 minimum load in top, coming from the load_balance_mo thread > staying in D-state. I get this on 2 different computers with similar > configs, so I am attaching one of them here. Ingo, I am reworking the fair-group load balance patches. Can you drop what you have until I resubmit? -- Regards, vatsa