From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 11/20] RT: Break out the search function
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:01:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071121011250.617947971@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20071121010054.663842380@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: sched-break-out-search.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3266 bytes --]
From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Isolate the search logic into a function so that it can be used later
in places other than find_locked_lowest_rq().
Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
---
kernel/sched_rt.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
Index: linux-compile.git/kernel/sched_rt.c
===================================================================
--- linux-compile.git.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c 2007-11-20 19:53:04.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-compile.git/kernel/sched_rt.c 2007-11-20 19:53:05.000000000 -0500
@@ -260,54 +260,66 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_hig
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_t, local_cpu_mask);
-/* Will lock the rq it finds */
-static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task,
- struct rq *this_rq)
+static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task)
{
- struct rq *lowest_rq = NULL;
int cpu;
- int tries;
cpumask_t *cpu_mask = &__get_cpu_var(local_cpu_mask);
+ struct rq *lowest_rq = NULL;
cpus_and(*cpu_mask, cpu_online_map, task->cpus_allowed);
- for (tries = 0; tries < RT_MAX_TRIES; tries++) {
- /*
- * Scan each rq for the lowest prio.
- */
- for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, *cpu_mask) {
- struct rq *rq = &per_cpu(runqueues, cpu);
+ /*
+ * Scan each rq for the lowest prio.
+ */
+ for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, *cpu_mask) {
+ struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
- if (cpu == this_rq->cpu)
- continue;
+ if (cpu == rq->cpu)
+ continue;
- /* We look for lowest RT prio or non-rt CPU */
- if (rq->rt.highest_prio >= MAX_RT_PRIO) {
- lowest_rq = rq;
- break;
- }
+ /* We look for lowest RT prio or non-rt CPU */
+ if (rq->rt.highest_prio >= MAX_RT_PRIO) {
+ lowest_rq = rq;
+ break;
+ }
- /* no locking for now */
- if (rq->rt.highest_prio > task->prio &&
- (!lowest_rq || rq->rt.highest_prio > lowest_rq->rt.highest_prio)) {
- lowest_rq = rq;
- }
+ /* no locking for now */
+ if (rq->rt.highest_prio > task->prio &&
+ (!lowest_rq || rq->rt.highest_prio > lowest_rq->rt.highest_prio)) {
+ lowest_rq = rq;
}
+ }
+
+ return lowest_rq ? lowest_rq->cpu : -1;
+}
+
+/* Will lock the rq it finds */
+static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task,
+ struct rq *rq)
+{
+ struct rq *lowest_rq = NULL;
+ int cpu;
+ int tries;
- if (!lowest_rq)
+ for (tries = 0; tries < RT_MAX_TRIES; tries++) {
+ cpu = find_lowest_rq(task);
+
+ if (cpu == -1)
break;
+ lowest_rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+
/* if the prio of this runqueue changed, try again */
- if (double_lock_balance(this_rq, lowest_rq)) {
+ if (double_lock_balance(rq, lowest_rq)) {
/*
* We had to unlock the run queue. In
* the mean time, task could have
* migrated already or had its affinity changed.
* Also make sure that it wasn't scheduled on its rq.
*/
- if (unlikely(task_rq(task) != this_rq ||
+ if (unlikely(task_rq(task) != rq ||
!cpu_isset(lowest_rq->cpu, task->cpus_allowed) ||
- task_running(this_rq, task) ||
+ task_running(rq, task) ||
!task->se.on_rq)) {
spin_unlock(&lowest_rq->lock);
lowest_rq = NULL;
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-21 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-21 1:00 [PATCH v4 00/20] New RT Balancing version 4 Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 1:00 ` [PATCH v4 01/20] Add rt_nr_running accounting Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 1:00 ` [PATCH v4 02/20] track highest prio queued on runqueue Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 1:00 ` [PATCH v4 03/20] push RT tasks Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 1:00 ` [PATCH v4 04/20] RT overloaded runqueues accounting Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 1:00 ` [PATCH v4 05/20] pull RT tasks Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 1:01 ` [PATCH v4 06/20] wake up balance RT Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 1:01 ` [PATCH v4 07/20] disable CFS RT load balancing Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 1:01 ` [PATCH v4 08/20] Cache cpus_allowed weight for optimizing migration Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 1:01 ` [PATCH v4 09/20] RT: Consistency cleanup for this_rq usage Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 1:01 ` [PATCH v4 10/20] RT: Remove some CFS specific code from the wakeup path of RT tasks Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 1:01 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2007-11-21 1:01 ` [PATCH v4 12/20] RT: Allow current_cpu to be included in search Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 1:01 ` [PATCH v4 13/20] RT: Pre-route RT tasks on wakeup Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 1:01 ` [PATCH v4 14/20] RT: Optimize our cpu selection based on topology Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 1:01 ` [PATCH v4 15/20] RT: Optimize rebalancing Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 1:01 ` [PATCH v4 16/20] Avoid overload Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 1:01 ` [PATCH v4 17/20] RT: restore the migratable conditional Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 1:01 ` [PATCH v4 18/20] Optimize cpu search with hamming weight Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 1:01 ` [PATCH v4 19/20] Optimize out cpu_clears Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 2:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 3:10 ` [PATCH] Fix optimized search Gregory Haskins
2007-11-21 4:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 4:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 5:14 ` Gregory Haskins
2007-11-21 1:01 ` [PATCH v4 20/20] balance RT tasks no new wake up Steven Rostedt
2007-11-21 4:44 ` [PATCH 0/4] more RT balancing enhancements Gregory Haskins
2007-11-21 4:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] Fix optimized search Gregory Haskins
2007-11-21 4:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] RT: Add sched-domain roots Gregory Haskins
2007-11-21 4:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] RT: Only balance our RT tasks within our root-domain Gregory Haskins
2007-11-21 4:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] RT: Use a 2-d bitmap for searching lowest-pri CPU Gregory Haskins
2007-11-21 19:51 ` [PATCH 0/4] more RT balancing enhancements v6a Gregory Haskins
2007-11-21 19:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] SCHED: Add sched-domain roots Gregory Haskins
2007-11-21 19:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] SCHED: Track online cpus in the root-domain Gregory Haskins
2007-11-21 19:52 ` [PATCH 3/4] SCHED: Only balance our RT tasks within our root-domain Gregory Haskins
2007-11-21 19:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] SCHED: Use a 2-d bitmap for searching lowest-pri CPU Gregory Haskins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071121011250.617947971@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox