From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:39:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071121103951.GA5788@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b637ec0b0711210050x1fbd741bi9c7550b4ef611598@mail.gmail.com>
* Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com> wrote:
> To answer your latest mail, again I don't have numbers but from my
> point ov view:
>
> 23.1 < 23.1+ck < 23.8+cfs.24
>
> where 23.1+ck is slightly better than vanilla 23.1 and 23.8+cfs.24 is
> much better than 23.1+ck.
>
> My workload is pretty standard, F8+kde+firefox+kmail+amsn, some kernel
> compile and so on.
do you remember which particular workload improved the most, and in
roughly whatway? (no need for numbers - subjective impressions are
accurate enough for this)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-21 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-19 15:17 [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7 Ingo Molnar
2007-11-19 16:04 ` [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8,v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7 Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
2007-11-19 18:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-19 18:12 ` [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7 Erik Andersen
2007-11-19 18:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-19 19:24 ` Erik Andersen
2007-11-19 19:46 ` [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3,v2.6.23.8, " Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
2007-11-20 11:24 ` [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, " Damien Wyart
2007-11-20 12:41 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-20 12:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 13:22 ` Damien Wyart
2007-11-20 20:00 ` Vincent Fortier
2007-11-20 20:38 ` Fabio Comolli
2007-11-20 20:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 20:47 ` Fabio Comolli
2007-11-20 21:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-21 8:50 ` Fabio Comolli
2007-11-21 10:39 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-11-21 11:11 ` Fabio Comolli
2007-11-26 20:59 ` [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.9, " Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-19 18:25 [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8,v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7 David
2007-11-19 18:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-19 19:51 ` David
2007-11-19 20:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-19 20:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-19 21:39 ` David
2007-11-20 6:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 9:23 ` David
2007-11-20 22:48 [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7 Matthew
2007-11-20 22:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-23 8:23 Durand
2007-11-23 12:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-23 16:44 ` Durand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071121103951.GA5788@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=fabio.comolli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox