From: "(``-_-´´) -- Fernando" <ubuntu@bugabundo.net>
To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is it possible to give the user the option to cancel forkbombs?
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:05:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711220005.32569.Ubuntu@bugabundo.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <473E9290.3040006@minimum.se>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1810 bytes --]
On Saturday 17 November 2007 07:04:48 Martin Olsson wrote:
> Repro steps:
>
> 1. Install gutsy gibbon (or probably any ubuntu)
> 2. Start a gnome terminal
> 3. Run this command:
>
> :(){ :|:& };:
>
> 4. Ubuntu starts to work furiously, after less than a second terminal
> gets flooded with "low resources" message, and within a few seconds the
> whole machine breaks down complete to the point where no a single pixel
> is updated and the mouse cannot be moved at all. It's not possible to
> escape to a ALT-Fn console terminal and CTRL-ALT-DEL does not work.
>
> Okay, so this is not as bad as winnuke.exe because it's not remote but I
> just did it on my shared hosting co and their server went down. And I
> mean seriously, there should be a way for a user to abort stuff that
> hogs resources this type of complete breakdown is NEVER acceptible. I
> had to power of the machine and my file system got royally screwed (long
> fsck etc).
>
> Some of you might say this is like the oldest trick in the book, yada
> yada yada...
>
> Martin
I used to see stuff like this happening on my University students test servers. Once they started doing forks inside for(;;), the server would go down.
Then they replaced the servers by vwmare machines, and now reboots are faster.
But I would like to see installed by default some script like AND(Auto Nice Daemon) or CpuLimit locking any and every process to a maximum of 90% after X seconds. That way one could allways launch a new command and kill it.
Of course, this is assuming that disk I/O is not our main prob, 'cause if that happens there's no way out.
--
BUGabundo :o)
(``-_-´´) http://Ubuntu.BUGabundo.net
Linux user #443786 GPG key 1024D/A1784EBB
My new micro-blog @ http://BUGabundo.net
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-22 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-17 5:51 Is it possible to give the user the option to cancel forkbombs? Martin Olsson
2007-11-16 21:31 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-17 7:04 ` Martin Olsson
2007-11-16 23:46 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-17 6:45 ` Dane Mutters
2007-11-17 7:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-17 10:39 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-17 13:36 ` Andi Kleen
2007-11-17 15:28 ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-17 17:42 ` Martin Olsson
2007-11-17 10:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-17 15:53 ` Diego Calleja
2007-11-17 17:55 ` Dane Mutters
2007-11-23 7:34 ` Radoslaw Szkodzinski
2007-11-22 0:05 ` (``-_-´´) -- Fernando [this message]
2007-11-22 12:03 ` David Newall
2007-11-16 21:38 ` Diego Calleja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200711220005.32569.Ubuntu@bugabundo.net \
--to=ubuntu@bugabundo.net \
--cc=Ubuntu-reply@bugabundo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox