From: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@acm.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
jens.axboe@oracle.com, greg@kroah.com, jeff@garzik.org
Cc: fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: [PATCH -mm 1/4] add accessors for segment_boundary_mask in device_dma_parameters
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:43:22 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071122113834B.tomof@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <522edb7703e4a70374b0c689cd7bae659fb0908b.tomof@acm.org>
This adds new accessors for segment_boundary_mask in
device_dma_parameters structure in the same way I did for
max_segment_size. So we can easily change where to place struct
device_dma_parameters in the future.
dma_get_segment boundary returns 0xffffffff if dma_parms in struct
device isn't set up properly. 0xffffffff is the default value used in
the block layer and the scsi mid layer.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
---
include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
index 71972ca..7d157ed 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
@@ -75,6 +75,21 @@ static inline unsigned int dma_set_max_seg_size(struct device *dev,
return -EIO;
}
+static inline unsigned long dma_get_seg_boundary(struct device *dev)
+{
+ return dev->dma_parms ?
+ dev->dma_parms->segment_boundary_mask : 0xffffffff;
+}
+
+static inline int dma_set_seg_boundary(struct device *dev, unsigned long mask)
+{
+ if (dev->dma_parms) {
+ dev->dma_parms->segment_boundary_mask = mask;
+ return 0;
+ } else
+ return -EIO;
+}
+
/* flags for the coherent memory api */
#define DMA_MEMORY_MAP 0x01
#define DMA_MEMORY_IO 0x02
--
1.5.3.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-22 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-22 2:43 [PATCH -mm 0/4] fix iommu segment boundary problems FUJITA Tomonori
2007-11-22 2:43 ` FUJITA Tomonori [this message]
2007-11-22 2:43 ` [PATCH -mm 2/4] PCI: add dma segment boundary support FUJITA Tomonori
2007-11-22 2:43 ` [PATCH -mm 3/4] swiotlb: respect the segment boundary limits FUJITA Tomonori
2007-11-22 2:43 ` [PATCH -mm 4/4] call dma_set_seg_boundary in __scsi_alloc_queue FUJITA Tomonori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071122113834B.tomof@acm.org \
--to=tomof@acm.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox