From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: nohz and strange sleep latencies
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:51:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071122185121.GA1803@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071120225246.GA24380@elte.hu>
Hi!
> > > Clock Event Device: hpet
> > > set_next_event: hpet_legacy_next_event
> > > set_mode: hpet_legacy_set_mode
> > > event_handler: tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast
> > >
> > > Clock Event Device: lapic
> > > set_next_event: lapic_next_event
> > > set_mode: lapic_timer_setup
> > > event_handler: hrtimer_interrupt
> > >
> > > Clock Event Device: lapic
> > > set_next_event: lapic_next_event
> > > set_mode: lapic_timer_setup
> > > event_handler: hrtimer_interrupt
> > >
> > > to me this has the feeling of lapic breakage in C2 mode. Does it get any
> > > better if you boot with 'nolapic'? (but that might in turn turn off
> > > high-res timers and nohz in essence) Thomas, any ideas?
> >
> > Hmm, lapic is considered unstable in c2 by default. You have to tell
> > the kernel that you trust it in C2 on the command line.
>
> yeah, i was wondering about that too. ACPI enumerated them properly at a
> certain stage:
>
> ACPI: CPU0 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C2] C3[C3])
> ACPI: CPU1 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C2] C3[C3])
>
> but perhaps somehow we miss this fact and fail to turn off the lapic
> clockevents drivers?
I can confirm that setting max-cstate=1 helps. (Plus, problem gets
_way_ more visible with stripped down config. With usb and irda off,
time sleep .01 easily takes 2 seconds).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-22 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-19 20:31 nohz and strange sleep latencies Pavel Machek
2007-11-19 20:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-19 21:11 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-20 8:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 9:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 10:54 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-20 20:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 22:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-11-20 22:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-22 10:09 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-22 18:51 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-11-22 18:52 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-22 20:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-11-23 12:22 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-24 22:29 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-24 22:40 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-24 23:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-24 23:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-25 21:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-11-25 20:25 ` [patch] " Pavel Machek
2007-11-25 21:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-11-26 11:54 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-20 9:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071122185121.GA1803@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox