public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
	dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	efault@gmx.de, skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>, Dipankar <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 4/4] sched: Improve fairness of cpu bandwidth allocation for task groups
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:28:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071126202836.GA17012@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071126050905.GF5304@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> +	/* we don't want this thread's execution to be limited by the shares
> +	 * assigned to default group (init_task_group). Hence make it run
> +	 * as a RT task.
> +	 */
> +	schedparm.sched_priority = 0; /* run at the lowest RT prio */
> +	ret = sched_setscheduler(current, SCHED_RR, &schedparm);
> +	if (ret)
> +		printk(KERN_ERR "Couldn't set SCHED_RR policy for load balance"
> +				"monitor thread (error = %d) \n", ret);

the first SCHED_RR priority is 1, not 0 - so this call will always fail.

> +		lock_cpu_hotplug(); /* Prevent cpus going down or coming up */
> +		lock_doms_cur();    /* lockout changes to doms_cur[] array */

please put comments in front of the line like we do in most of sched.c.

> +		rcu_read_lock();  /* to walk rq->sd chain on various cpus and to
> +				   * walk task group list in rebalance_shares().
> +				   */

the proper comment format is in front of the line and in:

	/*
	 * Comment.
	 */

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-26 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-19 12:27 [PATCH 0/2] sched: Group scheduler related patches Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-19 12:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched: Minor cleanups Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-19 13:08   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-19 15:01     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-19 12:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: Improve fairness of cpu allocation for task groups Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-19 13:12   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-19 15:03     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-19 15:22       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-19 16:06         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-19 19:00           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-26  5:00             ` [PATCH 0/4] sched: group scheduler related patches (V3) Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-26  5:02               ` [PATCH 1/4] sched: code cleanup Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-26  5:03               ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: minor fixes for group scheduler Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-26  5:05               ` [Patch 3/4 v1] sched: change how cpu load is calculated Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-26  5:06               ` [Patch 3/4 v2] " Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-26  5:09               ` [Patch 4/4] sched: Improve fairness of cpu bandwidth allocation for task groups Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-26 20:28                 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-11-27  5:06                   ` [Patch 0/5] sched: group scheduler related patches (V4) Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-27  5:08                     ` [Patch 1/5] sched: code cleanup Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-27  5:09                     ` [Patch 2/5] sched: minor fixes for group scheduler Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-27  5:11                     ` [Patch 3/5 v1] sched: change how cpu load is calculated Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-27  5:12                     ` [Patch 3/5 v2] " Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-27  5:21                     ` [Patch 4/5] sched: introduce a mutex and corresponding API to serialize access to doms_cur[] array Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-27  5:27                     ` [Patch 5/5] sched: Improve fairness of cpu bandwidth allocation for task groups Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-27 11:09                     ` [Patch 0/5] sched: group scheduler related patches (V4) Ingo Molnar
2007-11-27 11:42                       ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-27 12:53                         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-27 14:32                           ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-26 20:29                 ` [Patch 4/4] sched: Improve fairness of cpu bandwidth allocation for task groups Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071126202836.GA17012@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox