From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: uml doesn't work on 2.6.24-rc2
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:52:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071126205242.GA11444@c2.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1IsK83-0008CJ-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 04:26:11PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> This one fixed the EINVAL messages, and now UML boots, but consumes
> 100% CPU constantly.
Can you disable NO_HZ and try the patch below, which WorksForMe (TM)?
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
Index: linux-2.6.22/arch/um/os-Linux/time.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22.orig/arch/um/os-Linux/time.c 2007-11-14 10:33:29.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.22/arch/um/os-Linux/time.c 2007-11-26 15:50:46.000000000 -0500
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ long long disable_timer(void)
{
struct itimerval time = ((struct itimerval) { { 0, 0 }, { 0, 0 } });
- if(setitimer(ITIMER_VIRTUAL, &time, &time) < 0)
+ if (setitimer(ITIMER_VIRTUAL, &time, &time) < 0)
printk(UM_KERN_ERR "disable_timer - setitimer failed, "
"errno = %d\n", errno);
@@ -74,13 +74,61 @@ long long os_nsecs(void)
return timeval_to_ns(&tv);
}
+#ifdef UML_CONFIG_NO_HZ
+static int after_sleep_interval(struct timespec *ts)
+{
+}
+#else
+static inline long long timespec_to_us(const struct timespec *ts)
+{
+ return ((long long) ts->tv_sec * UM_USEC_PER_SEC) +
+ ts->tv_nsec / UM_NSEC_PER_USEC;
+}
+
+static int after_sleep_interval(struct timespec *ts)
+{
+ int usec = UM_USEC_PER_SEC / UM_HZ;
+ long long start_usecs = timespec_to_us(ts);
+ struct timeval tv;
+ struct itimerval interval;
+
+ /*
+ * It seems that rounding can increase the value returned from
+ * setitimer to larger than the one passed in. Over time,
+ * this will cause the remaining time to be greater than the
+ * tick interval. If this happens, then just reduce the first
+ * tick to the interval value.
+ */
+ if (start_usecs > usec)
+ start_usecs = usec;
+ tv = ((struct timeval) { .tv_sec = start_usecs / UM_USEC_PER_SEC,
+ .tv_usec = start_usecs % UM_USEC_PER_SEC });
+ interval = ((struct itimerval) { { 0, usec }, tv });
+
+ if (setitimer(ITIMER_VIRTUAL, &interval, NULL) == -1)
+ return -errno;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
extern void alarm_handler(int sig, struct sigcontext *sc);
void idle_sleep(unsigned long long nsecs)
{
- struct timespec ts = { .tv_sec = nsecs / UM_NSEC_PER_SEC,
- .tv_nsec = nsecs % UM_NSEC_PER_SEC };
+ struct timespec ts;
+
+ /*
+ * nsecs can come in as zero, in which case, this starts a
+ * busy loop. To prevent this, reset nsecs to the tick
+ * interval if it is zero.
+ */
+ if (nsecs == 0)
+ nsecs = UM_NSEC_PER_SEC / UM_HZ;
+ ts = ((struct timespec) { .tv_sec = nsecs / UM_NSEC_PER_SEC,
+ .tv_nsec = nsecs % UM_NSEC_PER_SEC });
if (nanosleep(&ts, &ts) == 0)
alarm_handler(SIGVTALRM, NULL);
+ after_sleep_interval(&ts);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-26 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-13 23:32 uml doesn't work on 2.6.24-rc2 Miklos Szeredi
2007-11-14 1:10 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-14 10:35 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-11-14 14:22 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-14 15:26 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-11-14 17:36 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-14 21:29 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-11-16 17:06 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-22 18:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-11-22 23:51 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-23 8:59 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-11-23 9:01 ` [uml-devel] " Karol Swietlicki
2007-11-23 10:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2007-11-23 11:00 ` WANG Cong
2007-11-26 17:47 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-26 18:10 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-26 20:52 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2007-11-26 21:22 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071126205242.GA11444@c2.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox