public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: "buggy cmd640" message followed by soft lockup)
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:57:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711262357.04817.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071126214554.GD917@stusta.de>

On Monday, 26 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 01:30:06AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, 26 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >...
> > > That's not possible, but as already said it's not required.
> > > And more important, it's unrelated to any problems we have.
> > > 
> > > And it sounds funny that you first write specifications mandating stuff 
> > > like "IMO, first, it should ask for what the bug is against" and then 
> > > demand an additional email interface that bypasses everything you 
> > > demanded previously.
> > 
> > I just realize that there are people who wouldn't like to use the web interface
> > and would prefer to use email instead.
> 
> In the cases where these are kernel developers that do (or should) 
> handle dozens of bugs each week I see a point if they have problems 
> integrating some medium into their workflow.
> 
> But in all software, no matter whether open source or commercial, bug 
> reporters simply have to use whatever the vendor offers as support 
> channel.

Yes.

That's why we should tell them what the channel is. :-)

> > Moreover, you won't force people to use the web interface only for reporting
> > bugs, because frankly for some kinds of problems it's too heavywieght
> 
> That developers who know what they are doing might bypass the bug
> tracking is not a problem.
> 
> > (compilation problems and purely software, reproducible things like that are
> > much faster resolved using email; this also applies to easily reproducible bugs
> > in general).  Still, it wouldn't hurt if they were automatically tracked.
> 
> This sounds like "a bit pregnant"...
> 
> Tracking requires things like e.g. categorizing the issue and marking it 
> as fixed when it got fixed.

Yes, but that may be done after the fact.  It's not a big problem to review an
email thread starting from a bug report and see if it lead to a fix (I do that
on a regular basis).  [Note: They tend to be relatively short. ]  You can even
check if the fix has been merged.

Still, you need to know which threads to review.

Greetings,
Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-26 22:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-22 19:07 "buggy cmd640" message followed by soft lockup Frans Pop
     [not found] ` <200711241904.13132.bzolnier@gmail.com>
2007-11-24 19:07   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-25  0:26     ` kernel bugzilla is FPOS (was: Re: "buggy cmd640" message followed by soft lockup) Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-11-25 13:11       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-25 13:49         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-25 20:07           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-25 20:08             ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2007-11-25 20:32             ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-25 21:28               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-25 21:36                 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-25 22:38                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-25 22:40                     ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-25 23:28                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-25 23:34                         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-26  0:30                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-26 21:45                             ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-26 22:57                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2007-11-25 22:55                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-25 14:08         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-11-25 20:25           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
     [not found]   ` <200711242038.06677.elendil@planet.nl>
2007-11-24 20:12     ` "buggy cmd640" message followed by soft lockup Rafael J. Wysocki
     [not found]     ` <200711250013.51279.bzolnier@gmail.com>
2007-11-26  1:32       ` Frans Pop

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200711262357.04817.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=protasnb@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox