From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760997AbXK1T1U (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:27:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755331AbXK1T1J (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:27:09 -0500 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:51443 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754815AbXK1T1H (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:27:07 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:27:03 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: "Yang, Bo" Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Patro, Sumant" , "Kolli, Neela" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: megaraid_sas - Fix random failure of DCDB cmds with sense info Message-ID: <20071128192703.GA2584@parisc-linux.org> References: <20071127153252.GC3230@parisc-linux.org> <9738BCBE884FDB42801FAD8A7769C26501D33B5B@NAMAIL1.ad.lsil.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9738BCBE884FDB42801FAD8A7769C26501D33B5B@NAMAIL1.ad.lsil.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:08:37PM -0700, Yang, Bo wrote: > Matthew, > > Yes, as I mentioned, our applications are built in 32-bit environment > (except for ia64). > We may see a different behavior if we build it in 64-bit for x86-64. Then this patch isn't acceptable. You need to find a way which works for both 32-bit and 64-bit applications. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."