Re: kobject_init rewrite

Alan Stern
2007-11-29T22:16:43Z

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Greg KH wrote:

> Ok, how about this function. If it errors out, it is free to just call
> kfree() on the kobject. Seems simple enough to me, any objections? If
> not, I'll go through and fix up the whole tree...

Looks good, _provided_ you also get rid of kobject_register(). Which
you pretty much would have to do anyway, since it doesn't accept the
ktype or the name as an argument.

Alan Stern