Re: kobject_init rewrite

Greg KH
2007-11-29T22:37:45Z

On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:16:28PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > Ok, how about this function. If it errors out, it is free to just call
> > kfree() on the kobject. Seems simple enough to me, any objections? If
> > not, I'll go through and fix up the whole tree...
>
> Looks good, _provided_ you also get rid of kobject_register(). Which
> you pretty much would have to do anyway, since it doesn't accept the
> ktype or the name as an argument.

Yes, I would do that at the same time.

Well, not at the _exact_ same time, it might take a few patches to get
there :)

thanks for the review,

greg k-h