From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] base/class.c: prevent ooops due to insert/remove race (v3)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:11:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071129221132.GA13651@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0711291700260.5666-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:07:58PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
>
> > > So again, the problem is in the higher up scsi layer, and that is where
> > > the problem should already be fixed.
> > ..
> >
> > Ahhh.. so you figure the Oops should also have been fixed
> > as part of the 2.6.24 SCSI fixes ? That's what I was missing here.
>
> Yes indeed. I wish I could point you to the exact patch containing the
> fix, but the git software seems to have lost track of it (it's combined
> in with a large number of other patches with no obvious way to separate
> it out). It's also available in the various mailing list archives, but
> I don't have a pointer to it and there's no reasonable way to search
> for it.
>
> The patch in question was written by Matthew Wilcox; it added code to
> the SCSI async-scanning routines to utilize the scan_mutex. IMO it
> should have been applied to 2.6.23 but it wasn't.
If someone can dig it out, and send it to stable@kernel.org, I'd be
gladd to add it to the older kernel trees...
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-29 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-29 4:00 [PATCH] base/class.c: prevent ooops due to insert/remove race Mark Lord
2007-11-29 4:33 ` Greg KH
2007-11-29 15:41 ` Mark Lord
2007-11-29 16:27 ` Greg KH
2007-11-29 17:45 ` Mark Lord
2007-11-29 17:48 ` Mark Lord
2007-11-29 17:50 ` Mark Lord
2007-11-29 18:09 ` [PATCH] base/class.c: prevent ooops due to insert/remove race (v3) Mark Lord
2007-11-29 18:12 ` Mark Lord
2007-11-29 19:20 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2007-11-29 20:01 ` Mark Lord
2007-11-29 20:12 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <474F1DB3.4030900@rtr.ca>
2007-11-29 20:25 ` Mark Lord
2007-11-29 20:32 ` Greg KH
2007-11-29 20:46 ` Mark Lord
2007-11-29 21:17 ` Greg KH
2007-11-29 22:07 ` Alan Stern
2007-11-29 22:11 ` Greg KH [this message]
2007-11-29 22:28 ` Mark Lord
2007-11-29 22:43 ` Alan Stern
2007-11-29 23:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-30 2:58 ` Alan Stern
2007-11-29 20:13 ` Alan Stern
2007-11-29 20:17 ` Mark Lord
2007-11-29 20:20 ` Mark Lord
2007-11-29 21:59 ` Alan Stern
2007-11-29 15:59 ` [PATCH] base/class.c: prevent ooops due to insert/remove race (v2) Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071129221132.GA13651@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).