Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

Christian Kujau
2007-11-13T20:01:31Z

On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I think that we're fairly good about working the regressions in
> Adrian/Michal/Rafael's lists but once Linus releases 2.6.x we tend to let
> the unsolved ones slide, and we don't pay as much attention to the
> regressions which 2.6.x testers report.

Can't we wait until all regressions[0] are fixed before releasing a new
2.6.x? I'd consider regressions a *literal* show stopper, and with this
policy they just have be fixed, nothing would "slide"...

my 2 cents,
Christian.

[0] preferably only reproducible regressions, with responsive reporters.
--
BOFH excuse #380:

Operators killed when huge stack of backup tapes fell over.