From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S934419AbXK3SMr@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S934419AbXK3SMr (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:12:47 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761731AbXK3SMd
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:12:33 -0500
Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:42798 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1761724AbXK3SMc (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:12:32 -0500
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:12:06 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 03/10] percpu: Make the asm-generic/percpu.h more
	"generic"
Message-ID: <20071130181206.GA1586@elte.hu>
References: <20071128210926.008783214@sgi.com> <20071128211526.640694725@sgi.com> <20071130111000.GA32431@elte.hu> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711300908320.32071@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20071130171419.GA18808@elte.hu> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711300915460.32253@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20071130175825.GA19571@elte.hu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071130175825.GA19571@elte.hu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean
X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5
X-ELTE-SpamLevel: 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no
X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3
	-1.5 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> which are those patches? I found only a single relevant patch:
> 
>  modules-fold-percpu_modcopy-into-modulec-and-get-rid-of-the-macro-from-hell.patch
> 
> anything else i missed?
> 
> this patch should have no relevance to the crash i reported. (i use a 
> bzImage) It's also a cleanup patch only, it should not affect 
> correctness.

as expected, with that patch applied, the kernel crashes and reboots 
(with no message this time). If you could point out any other dependent 
patches besides the one above (if any) that would be great.

	Ingo