From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
andi@firstfloor.org, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi,
lkml@astralstorm.puszkin.org, arjan@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 23:47:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200712032347.37723.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071203192426.GA8017@elte.hu>
On Monday, 3 of December 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> > > This feature will save one full reporter-developer round-trip during
> > > investigation of a significant number of bug reports.
> > >
> > > It might be more practical if it were to dump the traces for _all_
> > > D-state processes when it fires - basically an auto-triggered
> > > sysrq-W.
> >
> > Er, it won't play well if that happen when tasks are frozen for
> > suspend.
>
> right now any suspend attempt times out after 20 seconds:
>
> $ grep TIMEOUT kernel/power/process.c
> #define TIMEOUT (20 * HZ)
> end_time = jiffies + TIMEOUT;
This is the timeout for freezing tasks, but if the freezing succeeds, they
can stay in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE for quite some more time, especially during
a hibernation (the tasks stay frozen until we power off the system after saving
the image).
> which should be well before the 120 seconds timeout that the detector
> uses. But indeed you are right in that the refrigerator() works via
> TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE too. I've updated the patch to exclude PF_FROZEN -
> attached below. That should solve this particular issue, even if the
> timeout increased to above 20 secs, right?
Sure.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-03 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-01 9:20 [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks Ingo Molnar
2007-12-01 18:31 ` David Rientjes
2007-12-01 18:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-01 18:42 ` David Rientjes
2007-12-01 19:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-02 0:54 ` Ingo Oeser
2007-12-02 8:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-02 15:52 ` David Rientjes
2007-12-02 18:57 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-02 18:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-02 19:41 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-02 20:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-02 20:09 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-02 20:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-02 20:47 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-02 21:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-02 21:19 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-02 21:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-02 21:34 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-02 22:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-02 22:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-02 22:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-03 0:00 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-02 22:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-03 0:07 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-03 0:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-03 9:55 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-03 10:15 ` Radoslaw Szkodzinski
2007-12-03 10:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-03 10:27 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-03 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-03 11:04 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-03 11:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-03 12:13 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-03 12:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-03 12:41 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-03 13:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-03 13:14 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <20071203132955.GA31354@elte.hu>
2007-12-03 13:41 ` Radoslaw Szkodzinski
2007-12-03 13:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-03 14:15 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-03 13:48 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-03 13:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-03 14:17 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-03 14:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-03 17:02 ` Ray Lee
2007-12-03 13:50 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-12-03 13:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-03 14:14 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-03 14:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-03 17:57 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-03 18:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-03 19:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-03 22:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2007-12-04 0:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-03 15:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-03 16:36 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-05 22:31 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200712032347.37723.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@astralstorm.puszkin.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox