From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754317AbXLEKbt (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 05:31:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751624AbXLEKbl (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 05:31:41 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:44121 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750896AbXLEKbk (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 05:31:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 11:31:11 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Linus Torvalds , Steven Rostedt , LKML , David Holmes - Sun Microsystems , Andrew Morton , Stable Team Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] fix for futex_wait signal stack corruption Message-ID: <20071205103111.GD22792@elte.hu> References: <1196801858.1645.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071204213924.GA14915@goodmis.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Just a minor nit. Can we please use "futex" instead of "fu" ? I'm just > envisioning the next union member named "ba". > > Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner > > Please apply with the s/fu/futex/ change. This needs to go into stable > .22/.23 as well. ok, i've tied it all up, collected the Acks and will push Steve's fix to Linus via the scheduler git tree - is that fine with everyone? I think there's enough time to get this tested - Linus's latest tree shows up in Fedora rawhide in 1-2 days and tons of apps use futexes. Ingo