* [PATCH] no need to mess with KBUILD_CFLAGS on uml-i386 anymore
@ 2007-12-05 8:36 Al Viro
2007-12-05 16:18 ` Jeff Dike
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2007-12-05 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: jdike, linux-kernel
Now that X86_32 is provided on Kconfig level for uml-i386, there's
no need to play with it explicitly on Makefile level anymore.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
diff --git a/arch/um/Makefile-i386 b/arch/um/Makefile-i386
index 6729011..561e373 100644
--- a/arch/um/Makefile-i386
+++ b/arch/um/Makefile-i386
@@ -22,11 +22,6 @@ export LDFLAGS HOSTCFLAGS HOSTLDFLAGS UML_OBJCOPYFLAGS
endif
endif
-KBUILD_CFLAGS += -DCONFIG_X86_32
-KBUILD_AFLAGS += -DCONFIG_X86_32
-CONFIG_X86_32 := y
-export CONFIG_X86_32
-
# First of all, tune CFLAGS for the specific CPU. This actually sets cflags-y.
include $(srctree)/arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] no need to mess with KBUILD_CFLAGS on uml-i386 anymore
2007-12-05 8:36 [PATCH] no need to mess with KBUILD_CFLAGS on uml-i386 anymore Al Viro
@ 2007-12-05 16:18 ` Jeff Dike
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Dike @ 2007-12-05 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Al Viro; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, linux-kernel
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 08:36:15AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Now that X86_32 is provided on Kconfig level for uml-i386, there's
> no need to play with it explicitly on Makefile level anymore.
ACK
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-05 16:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-12-05 8:36 [PATCH] no need to mess with KBUILD_CFLAGS on uml-i386 anymore Al Viro
2007-12-05 16:18 ` Jeff Dike
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox