From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: stable@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Subject: [PATCH 2.6.21 through 2.6.23] ACPICA: fix acpi-cpufreq boot crash due to _PSD return-by-reference
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 23:42:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200712052342.10986.lenb@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
This bug has been in the ACPICA interpreter since the beginning of time.
It is a reference-after-free bug due to the interpreter doing a
"return by reference" on local objects instead of a "return by value"
when the objects are part of a package.
It could technically happen for any AML code, but slab debugging
exposed it for the first time (we think) on some new hardware
when we were interpreting some AML on behalf of acpi-cpufreq initialization.
This patch shipped in linux-2.6.24-rc4,
but it applies cleanly back through 2.6.21.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
contains backports through 2.6.16.
-Len
Changed resolution of named references in packages
Fixed a problem with the Package operator where all named
references were created as object references and left otherwise
unresolved. According to the ACPI specification, a Package can
only contain Data Objects or references to control methods. The
implication is that named references to Data Objects (Integer,
Buffer, String, Package, BufferField, Field) should be resolved
immediately upon package creation. This is the approach taken
with this change. References to all other named objects (Methods,
Devices, Scopes, etc.) are all now properly created as reference objects.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5328
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
drivers/acpi/dispatcher/dsobject.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dispatcher/dsobject.c b/drivers/acpi/dispatcher/dsobject.c
index a474ca2..954ac8c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/dispatcher/dsobject.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/dispatcher/dsobject.c
@@ -137,6 +137,71 @@ acpi_ds_build_internal_object(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state,
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
}
}
+
+ /* Special object resolution for elements of a package */
+
+ if ((op->common.parent->common.aml_opcode == AML_PACKAGE_OP) ||
+ (op->common.parent->common.aml_opcode ==
+ AML_VAR_PACKAGE_OP)) {
+ /*
+ * Attempt to resolve the node to a value before we insert it into
+ * the package. If this is a reference to a common data type,
+ * resolve it immediately. According to the ACPI spec, package
+ * elements can only be "data objects" or method references.
+ * Attempt to resolve to an Integer, Buffer, String or Package.
+ * If cannot, return the named reference (for things like Devices,
+ * Methods, etc.) Buffer Fields and Fields will resolve to simple
+ * objects (int/buf/str/pkg).
+ *
+ * NOTE: References to things like Devices, Methods, Mutexes, etc.
+ * will remain as named references. This behavior is not described
+ * in the ACPI spec, but it appears to be an oversight.
+ */
+ obj_desc = (union acpi_operand_object *)op->common.node;
+
+ status =
+ acpi_ex_resolve_node_to_value(ACPI_CAST_INDIRECT_PTR
+ (struct
+ acpi_namespace_node,
+ &obj_desc),
+ walk_state);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+ return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
+ }
+
+ switch (op->common.node->type) {
+ /*
+ * For these types, we need the actual node, not the subobject.
+ * However, the subobject got an extra reference count above.
+ */
+ case ACPI_TYPE_MUTEX:
+ case ACPI_TYPE_METHOD:
+ case ACPI_TYPE_POWER:
+ case ACPI_TYPE_PROCESSOR:
+ case ACPI_TYPE_EVENT:
+ case ACPI_TYPE_REGION:
+ case ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE:
+ case ACPI_TYPE_THERMAL:
+
+ obj_desc =
+ (union acpi_operand_object *)op->common.
+ node;
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If above resolved to an operand object, we are done. Otherwise,
+ * we have a NS node, we must create the package entry as a named
+ * reference.
+ */
+ if (ACPI_GET_DESCRIPTOR_TYPE(obj_desc) !=
+ ACPI_DESC_TYPE_NAMED) {
+ goto exit;
+ }
+ }
}
/* Create and init a new internal ACPI object */
@@ -156,6 +221,7 @@ acpi_ds_build_internal_object(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state,
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
}
+ exit:
*obj_desc_ptr = obj_desc;
return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_OK);
}
@@ -356,12 +422,25 @@ acpi_ds_build_internal_package_obj(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state,
arg = arg->common.next;
for (i = 0; arg && (i < element_count); i++) {
if (arg->common.aml_opcode == AML_INT_RETURN_VALUE_OP) {
-
- /* This package element is already built, just get it */
-
- obj_desc->package.elements[i] =
- ACPI_CAST_PTR(union acpi_operand_object,
- arg->common.node);
+ if (arg->common.node->type == ACPI_TYPE_METHOD) {
+ /*
+ * A method reference "looks" to the parser to be a method
+ * invocation, so we special case it here
+ */
+ arg->common.aml_opcode = AML_INT_NAMEPATH_OP;
+ status =
+ acpi_ds_build_internal_object(walk_state,
+ arg,
+ &obj_desc->
+ package.
+ elements[i]);
+ } else {
+ /* This package element is already built, just get it */
+
+ obj_desc->package.elements[i] =
+ ACPI_CAST_PTR(union acpi_operand_object,
+ arg->common.node);
+ }
} else {
status = acpi_ds_build_internal_object(walk_state, arg,
&obj_desc->
--
1.5.3.7.949.g2221a6
reply other threads:[~2007-12-06 4:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200712052342.10986.lenb@kernel.org \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox