From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Giacomo Catenazzi <cate@cateee.net>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: proc/bus.usb regression in : [NETNS]: Fix /proc/net breakage
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 00:31:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071206003134.80a7ad57.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4757B121.6000308@cateee.net>
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 09:21:53 +0100 Giacomo Catenazzi <cate@cateee.net> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 19:00:25 GMT Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2b1e300a9dfc3196ccddf6f1d74b91b7af55e416
> >> Commit: 2b1e300a9dfc3196ccddf6f1d74b91b7af55e416
> >> Parent: e03ba84adb62fbc6049325a5bc00ef6932fa5e39
> >> Author: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> >> AuthorDate: Sun Dec 2 00:33:17 2007 +1100
> >> Committer: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> >> CommitDate: Sun Dec 2 00:33:17 2007 +1100
> >>
> >> [NETNS]: Fix /proc/net breakage
> >>
> >> Well I clearly goofed when I added the initial network namespace support
> >> for /proc/net. Currently things work but there are odd details visible to
> >> user space, even when we have a single network namespace.
> >>
> >> Since we do not cache proc_dir_entry dentries at the moment we can just
> >> modify ->lookup to return a different directory inode depending on the
> >> network namespace of the process looking at /proc/net, replacing the
> >> current technique of using a magic and fragile follow_link method.
> >>
> >> To accomplish that this patch:
> >> - introduces a shadow_proc method to allow different dentries to
> >> be returned from proc_lookup.
> >> - Removes the old /proc/net follow_link magic
> >> - Fixes a weakness in our not caching of proc generic dentries.
> >>
> >> As shadow_proc uses a task struct to decided which dentry to return we can
> >> go back later and fix the proc generic caching without modifying any code
> >> that uses the shadow_proc method.
> >
> > This patch caused the binfmt_misc regression reported in
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9504
>
> This patch also doesn't allow to mount /proc/bus/usb
>
Does Denis's patch fix it?
Thanks.
From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
/proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc dentry disappeared during d_revalidate.
d_revalidate only dentries from shadowed one and below.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9504
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Cc: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/proc/generic.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/proc/generic.c~lost-content-of-proc-sys-fs-binfmt_misc fs/proc/generic.c
--- a/fs/proc/generic.c~lost-content-of-proc-sys-fs-binfmt_misc
+++ a/fs/proc/generic.c
@@ -380,12 +380,17 @@ static int proc_revalidate_dentry(struct
return 0;
}
-static struct dentry_operations proc_dentry_operations =
+static struct dentry_operations proc_dentry_shadow_operations =
{
.d_delete = proc_delete_dentry,
.d_revalidate = proc_revalidate_dentry,
};
+static struct dentry_operations proc_dentry_operations =
+{
+ .d_delete = proc_delete_dentry,
+};
+
/*
* Don't create negative dentries here, return -ENOENT by hand
* instead.
@@ -394,6 +399,7 @@ struct dentry *proc_lookup(struct inode
{
struct inode *inode = NULL;
struct proc_dir_entry * de;
+ int use_shadow = 0;
int error = -ENOENT;
lock_kernel();
@@ -406,8 +412,10 @@ struct dentry *proc_lookup(struct inode
if (!memcmp(dentry->d_name.name, de->name, de->namelen)) {
unsigned int ino;
- if (de->shadow_proc)
+ if (de->shadow_proc) {
de = de->shadow_proc(current, de);
+ use_shadow = 1;
+ }
ino = de->low_ino;
de_get(de);
spin_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
@@ -423,6 +431,8 @@ struct dentry *proc_lookup(struct inode
if (inode) {
dentry->d_op = &proc_dentry_operations;
+ dentry->d_op = use_shadow ?
+ &proc_dentry_shadow_operations : dentry->d_parent->d_op;
d_add(dentry, inode);
return NULL;
}
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-06 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200712031900.lB3J0PR9025742@hera.kernel.org>
2007-12-05 12:02 ` [NETNS]: Fix /proc/net breakage Andrew Morton
2007-12-06 8:21 ` proc/bus.usb regression in : " Giacomo Catenazzi
2007-12-06 8:31 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-12-06 18:01 ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2007-12-06 8:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071206003134.80a7ad57.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cate@cateee.net \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox