public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH git-sched 1/3] no need for 'affine wakeup' balancing in select_task_rq_fair() when task_cpu(p) == this_cpu
@ 2007-12-09 18:36 Dmitry Adamushko
  2007-12-10  8:37 ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Adamushko @ 2007-12-09 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Steven Rostedt, Gregory Haskins, LKML Kernel

From: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>

No need to do a check for 'affine wakeup and passive balancing possibilities' in
select_task_rq_fair() when task_cpu(p) == this_cpu.

I guess, this part got missed upon introduction of per-sched_class select_task_rq()
in try_to_wake_up().

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>

---

diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index f881fc5..2208692 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -925,6 +925,9 @@ static int select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sync)
 	this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	new_cpu  = cpu;
 
+	if (cpu == this_cpu)
+		goto out_set_cpu;
+
 	for_each_domain(this_cpu, sd) {
 		if (cpu_isset(cpu, sd->span)) {
 			this_sd = sd;



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-10  8:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-12-09 18:36 [PATCH git-sched 1/3] no need for 'affine wakeup' balancing in select_task_rq_fair() when task_cpu(p) == this_cpu Dmitry Adamushko
2007-12-10  8:37 ` Ingo Molnar

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox