From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yoichi Yuasa <yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Please revert: PCI: fix IDE legacy mode resources
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:26:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071210132635.GA12913@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1197185091.6572.38.camel@pasglop>
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 06:24:51PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> If that is the case though (that is it can't issue low ioport cycles),
> how would have the fd6e7321... worked in the first place ? Hrm...
> strange. My understanding is that all that patch does is put junk in the
> pci_dev resource structures :-) Maybe that's enough to cause the PCI
> layer later on to be unhappy about them and reassign the BARs to some
> place that works ? In which case, you are right, a better approach is a
> quirk on this specific platform, or even better, mark 0...0x10000000
> busy in ioport_resources and let the generic code clash & re-assign...
>
> I must admit I'm a bit confused tho...
>
> Anyway, so far, nobody is arguing in favor of keeping this patch in nor
> so far trying and explanation on why it wouldn't be totally bogus, so I
> suggest we revert it :-)
I certainly don't oppose at this point.
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-10 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200710122305.l9CN5tFI008240@hera.kernel.org>
2007-12-06 0:10 ` Please revert: PCI: fix IDE legacy mode resources Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-06 4:34 ` Yoichi Yuasa
2007-12-06 5:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-06 5:58 ` Yoichi Yuasa
2007-12-06 6:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-09 2:12 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-12-09 7:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-09 9:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-09 12:46 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-12-09 13:39 ` Alan Cox
2007-12-09 20:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-09 13:38 ` Alan Cox
2007-12-09 20:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-09 22:23 ` Alan Cox
2007-12-09 22:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-10 4:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-10 11:20 ` Alan Cox
2007-12-10 13:40 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-12-10 15:01 ` Alan Cox
2007-12-10 15:47 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-12-10 20:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-11 0:05 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-12-11 0:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-11 12:13 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-12-10 20:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-10 23:07 ` Alan Cox
2007-12-11 0:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-10 13:38 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-12-10 13:26 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2007-12-06 12:32 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-12-06 15:24 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071210132635.GA12913@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox