From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4 v2] Replace hooks with pre/post schedule and wakeup methods
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:00:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071211031458.413167005@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20071211030033.632581735@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: sched-pre-post-schedule-methods.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4642 bytes --]
To make the main sched.c code more agnostic to the schedule classes.
Instead of having specific hooks in the schedule code for the RT class
balancing. They are replaced with a pre_schedule, post_schedule
and task_wake_up methods. These methods may be used by any of the classes
but currently, only the sched_rt class implements them.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 3 +++
kernel/sched.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
kernel/sched_rt.c | 17 +++++++----------
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Index: linux-sched/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-sched.orig/include/linux/sched.h 2007-12-10 20:39:11.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-sched/include/linux/sched.h 2007-12-10 20:39:14.000000000 -0500
@@ -848,6 +848,9 @@ struct sched_class {
int (*move_one_task) (struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu,
struct rq *busiest, struct sched_domain *sd,
enum cpu_idle_type idle);
+ void (*pre_schedule) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task);
+ void (*post_schedule) (struct rq *this_rq);
+ void (*task_wake_up) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task);
#endif
void (*set_curr_task) (struct rq *rq);
Index: linux-sched/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-sched.orig/kernel/sched.c 2007-12-10 20:39:11.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-sched/kernel/sched.c 2007-12-10 20:39:14.000000000 -0500
@@ -1620,7 +1620,10 @@ out_activate:
out_running:
p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
- wakeup_balance_rt(rq, p);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ if (p->sched_class->task_wake_up)
+ p->sched_class->task_wake_up(rq, p);
+#endif
out:
task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
@@ -1743,7 +1746,10 @@ void fastcall wake_up_new_task(struct ta
inc_nr_running(p, rq);
}
check_preempt_curr(rq, p);
- wakeup_balance_rt(rq, p);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ if (p->sched_class->task_wake_up)
+ p->sched_class->task_wake_up(rq, p);
+#endif
task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
}
@@ -1864,7 +1870,10 @@ static void finish_task_switch(struct rq
prev_state = prev->state;
finish_arch_switch(prev);
finish_lock_switch(rq, prev);
- schedule_tail_balance_rt(rq);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ if (current->sched_class->post_schedule)
+ current->sched_class->post_schedule(rq);
+#endif
fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers(current);
if (mm)
@@ -3633,7 +3642,10 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
switch_count = &prev->nvcsw;
}
- schedule_balance_rt(rq, prev);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ if (prev->sched_class->pre_schedule)
+ prev->sched_class->pre_schedule(rq, prev);
+#endif
if (unlikely(!rq->nr_running))
idle_balance(cpu, rq);
Index: linux-sched/kernel/sched_rt.c
===================================================================
--- linux-sched.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c 2007-12-10 20:39:11.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-sched/kernel/sched_rt.c 2007-12-10 20:39:14.000000000 -0500
@@ -689,14 +689,14 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_
return ret;
}
-static void schedule_balance_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
+static void pre_schedule_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
/* Try to pull RT tasks here if we lower this rq's prio */
if (unlikely(rt_task(prev)) && rq->rt.highest_prio > prev->prio)
pull_rt_task(rq);
}
-static void schedule_tail_balance_rt(struct rq *rq)
+static void post_schedule_rt(struct rq *rq)
{
/*
* If we have more than one rt_task queued, then
@@ -713,10 +713,9 @@ static void schedule_tail_balance_rt(str
}
-static void wakeup_balance_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+static void task_wake_up_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
- if (unlikely(rt_task(p)) &&
- !task_running(rq, p) &&
+ if (!task_running(rq, p) &&
(p->prio >= rq->rt.highest_prio) &&
rq->rt.overloaded)
push_rt_tasks(rq);
@@ -780,11 +779,6 @@ static void leave_domain_rt(struct rq *r
if (rq->rt.overloaded)
rt_clear_overload(rq);
}
-
-#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
-# define schedule_tail_balance_rt(rq) do { } while (0)
-# define schedule_balance_rt(rq, prev) do { } while (0)
-# define wakeup_balance_rt(rq, p) do { } while (0)
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
static void task_tick_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
@@ -838,6 +832,9 @@ const struct sched_class rt_sched_class
.set_cpus_allowed = set_cpus_allowed_rt,
.join_domain = join_domain_rt,
.leave_domain = leave_domain_rt,
+ .pre_schedule = pre_schedule_rt,
+ .post_schedule = post_schedule_rt,
+ .task_wake_up = task_wake_up_rt,
#endif
.set_curr_task = set_curr_task_rt,
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-11 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-11 3:00 [PATCH 0/4 v2] RT balance updates against sched-devel Steven Rostedt
2007-12-11 3:00 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2007-12-11 3:00 ` [PATCH 2/4 v2] added methods for sched_class changes Steven Rostedt
2007-12-11 3:00 ` [PATCH 3/4 v2] SCHED - Only adjust overload state when changing Steven Rostedt
2007-12-11 3:00 ` [PATCH 4/4 v2] Subject: SCHED - Clean up some old cpuset logic Steven Rostedt
2007-12-11 8:05 ` [PATCH 0/4 v2] RT balance updates against sched-devel Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071211031458.413167005@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox