From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: dor.laor@qumranet.com
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:27:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071211142717.GA15903@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <475E9A92.4030001@qumranet.com>
* Dor Laor <dor.laor@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here [include/asm-x86/tsc.h]:
>
> /* Like get_cycles, but make sure the CPU is synchronized. */
> static __always_inline cycles_t get_cycles_sync(void)
> {
> unsigned long long ret;
> unsigned eax, edx;
>
> /*
> * Use RDTSCP if possible; it is guaranteed to be synchronous
> * and doesn't cause a VMEXIT on Hypervisors
> */
> alternative_io(ASM_NOP3, ".byte 0x0f,0x01,0xf9", X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP,
> ASM_OUTPUT2("=a" (eax), "=d" (edx)),
> "a" (0U), "d" (0U) : "ecx", "memory");
> ret = (((unsigned long long)edx) << 32) | ((unsigned long long)eax);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> /*
> * Don't do an additional sync on CPUs where we know
> * RDTSC is already synchronous:
> */
> // alternative_io("cpuid", ASM_NOP2, X86_FEATURE_SYNC_RDTSC,
> // "=a" (eax), "0" (1) : "ebx","ecx","edx","memory");
> rdtscll(ret);
The patch below should resolve this - could you please test and Ack it?
But this CPUID was present in v2.6.23 too, so why did it only show up in
2.6.24-rc for you?
Ingo
-------------->
Subject: x86: fix get_cycles_sync() overhead
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
get_cycles_sync() is causing massive overhead in KVM networking:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/11/54
remove the explicit CPUID serialization - it causes VM exits and is
pointless: we care about GTOD coherency but that goes to user-space
via a syscall, and syscalls are serialization points anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
include/asm-x86/tsc.h | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: linux-x86.q/include/asm-x86/tsc.h
===================================================================
--- linux-x86.q.orig/include/asm-x86/tsc.h
+++ linux-x86.q/include/asm-x86/tsc.h
@@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ static __always_inline cycles_t get_cycl
unsigned eax, edx;
/*
- * Use RDTSCP if possible; it is guaranteed to be synchronous
- * and doesn't cause a VMEXIT on Hypervisors
+ * Use RDTSCP if possible; it is guaranteed to be synchronous
+ * and doesn't cause a VMEXIT on Hypervisors
*/
alternative_io(ASM_NOP3, ".byte 0x0f,0x01,0xf9", X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP,
ASM_OUTPUT2("=a" (eax), "=d" (edx)),
@@ -50,11 +50,11 @@ static __always_inline cycles_t get_cycl
return ret;
/*
- * Don't do an additional sync on CPUs where we know
- * RDTSC is already synchronous:
+ * Use RDTSC on other CPUs. This might not be fully synchronous,
+ * but it's not a problem: the only coherency we care about is
+ * the GTOD output to user-space, and syscalls are synchronization
+ * points anyway:
*/
- alternative_io("cpuid", ASM_NOP2, X86_FEATURE_SYNC_RDTSC,
- "=a" (eax), "0" (1) : "ebx","ecx","edx","memory");
rdtscll(ret);
return ret;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-11 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-11 13:11 Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync Dor Laor
2007-12-11 13:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-11 14:14 ` Dor Laor
[not found] ` <475E9A92.4030001@qumranet.com>
2007-12-11 14:27 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-12-11 15:03 ` Dor Laor
2007-12-11 16:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-11 17:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-11 17:23 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-11 20:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-11 20:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-11 21:26 ` [kvm-devel] " Joerg Roedel
2007-12-11 14:27 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-11 14:57 ` Dor Laor
2007-12-11 15:02 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071211142717.GA15903@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=dor.laor@qumranet.com \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox