From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jarkao2@gmail.com
Cc: auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com, gallatin@myri.com,
joonwpark81@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com,
shemminger@linux-foundation.org, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: napi fix
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 05:50:13 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071213.055013.83963139.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071213134953.GA3806@ff.dom.local>
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:49:53 +0100
> As a matter of fact, since it's "unlikely()" in net_rx_action() anyway,
> I wonder what is the main reason or gain of leaving such a tricky
> exception, instead of letting drivers to always decide which is the
> best moment for napi_complete()? (Or maybe even, in such a case, they
> should call some function with this list_move_tail() if it's so
> useful?)
It is the only sane way to synchronize the list manipulations.
There has to be a way for ->poll() to tell net_rx_action() two things:
1) How much work was completed, so we can adjust 'budget'
2) Was the NAPI quota exhausted? So that we know that
net_rx_action() still "owns" the polling context and
thus can do the list manipulation safely.
And these both need to be encoded into one single return value, thus
the adopted convention that "work == weight" means that the device has
not done a NAPI complete.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-13 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-12 17:29 [RFC] net: napi fix Andrew Gallatin
2007-12-12 17:38 ` David Miller
2007-12-12 17:40 ` Andrew Gallatin
2007-12-12 18:41 ` Kok, Auke
2007-12-13 7:41 ` Joonwoo Park
2007-12-13 14:13 ` Andrew Gallatin
2007-12-13 14:19 ` David Miller
2007-12-13 16:45 ` Kok, Auke
2007-12-13 18:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-12-13 19:02 ` Andrew Gallatin
2007-12-13 19:09 ` David Miller
2007-12-13 19:35 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-12-13 20:38 ` David Miller
2007-12-14 2:06 ` Joonwoo Park
2007-12-13 13:49 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-12-13 13:50 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-12-13 14:14 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-12-13 20:16 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-12-13 20:37 ` David Miller
2007-12-13 20:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-12-13 21:55 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-12-13 22:28 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-12-13 22:34 ` David Miller
2007-12-13 22:58 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-12-20 9:52 ` Robert Olsson
2007-12-20 11:22 ` David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-12-12 4:01 [PATCH 6/7] [NETDEV]: tehuti Fix possible causing oops of net_rx_action Joonwoo Park
2007-12-12 5:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-12-12 5:46 ` [RFC] net: napi fix Stephen Hemminger
2007-12-12 6:05 ` Joonwoo Park
2007-12-12 15:22 ` David Miller
2007-12-12 15:21 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071213.055013.83963139.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=gallatin@myri.com \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=joonwpark81@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox