From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764379AbXLNJxw (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 04:53:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754196AbXLNJxp (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 04:53:45 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:35403 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752331AbXLNJxo (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 04:53:44 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:53:15 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: "Arun Thomas" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: PROBLEM: E6850 has an 8+ minute delay during boot Message-Id: <20071214015315.09829a99.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <9a8cbed90712140110l156a34e3x38533b7710544cf8@mail.gmail.com> References: <9a8cbed90712140110l156a34e3x38533b7710544cf8@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 04:10:31 -0500 "Arun Thomas" wrote: > My Dell Vostro desktop w/ an Intel E6850 dual-core 3GHz CPU has an 8+ > minute delay during boot. The machine seems to run fine after it > boots. The problem occurs on the Ubuntu gutsy 2.6.22-14 kernel, > 2.6.23.9, and 2.6.24-rc5. I have upgraded to the most recent Dell BIOS > version (1.0.8). I am running an SMP kernel currently, but the problem > presents itself in uniprocessor mode (nosmp) also. I'm running the > machine in 32-bit mode w/hyperthreading configured. > > Here are a few interesting things in the dmesg output for the > 2.6.24-rc5 kernel (smp). The full dmesg is also included farther down. > > [ 20.101501] CPU: After generic identify, caps: bfebfbff 20100000 > 00000000 00000000 0000e3fd 00000000 00000001 00000000 > [ 20.101505] monitor/mwait feature present. > [ 20.101506] using mwait in idle threads. > [ 20.101508] CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K > [ 20.101509] CPU: L2 cache: 4096K > [ 20.101511] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0 > [ 20.101511] CPU: Processor Core ID: 0 > [ 20.101513] CPU: After all inits, caps: bfebfbff 20100000 00000000 > 00003940 0000e3fd 00000000 00000001 00000000 > [ 20.101517] Compat vDSO mapped to ffffe000. > [ 20.101525] Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. > [ 20.117651] SMP alternatives: switching to UP code > [ 20.118574] ACPI: Core revision 20070126 > [ 20.175154] CPU0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6850 @ 3.00GHz stepping 0b > [ 20.175163] SMP alternatives: switching to SMP code > [ 20.175437] Booting processor 1/1 eip 3000 > [ 20.185881] Initializing CPU#1 > [ 527.926587] Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. > 200566.59 BogoMIPS (lpj=401133185) > [ 527.926592] CPU: After generic identify, caps: bfebfbff 20100000 > 00000000 00000000 0000e3fd 00000000 00000001 00000000 > [ 527.926595] monitor/mwait feature present. > [ 527.926596] CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K > [ 527.926597] CPU: L2 cache: 4096K > [ 527.926599] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0 Silly question: is that delay actually observeable by a human, or is it just a leap in the printk timestamping?