From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759723AbXLNIEC (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 03:04:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753464AbXLNIDw (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 03:03:52 -0500 Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([87.55.233.238]:12692 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753427AbXLNIDw (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 03:03:52 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:03:49 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: "Theodore Ts'o" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What happened to this patch? (Re: [BUG] panic after umount (biscted)) Message-ID: <20071214080348.GG19673@kernel.dk> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 13 2007, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > I was going through my set of kernel patches that I've cherry picked on > LKML for my private kernel, and I noticed this hasn't gotten merged into > mainline yet. The original thread was here: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/27/61 > > and addressed a panic after a umount reported by Sebastian Siewior. Was > this addressed in some other way? Yes, the below wasn't a proposal for inclusion, the problem got fixed differently by commit 51fd77bd9f512ab6cc9df0733ba1caaab89eb957 -- Jens Axboe