public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alistair John Strachan <alistair@devzero.co.uk>
To: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: New question on that sata controller
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:17:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200712152217.28865.alistair@devzero.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200712151624.09115.gene.heskett@gmail.com>

On Saturday 15 December 2007 21:24:09 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 15 December 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:
> >Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> Greetings;
> >>
> >> When I asked about a sata controller earlier this week, I gave a link to
> >> it. Unforch (maybe) when it actually arrived, the cards box showed a
> >> silicon image chip, and the card had a via.  So much for getting what I
> >> ordered...
> >>
> >> The required module then was sata_via, not sata_uli, and it seems to be
> >> working ok.  However, this one claims its a raid controller according to
> >> an lspci -v:
> >>
> >> 01:0a.0 RAID bus controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6421 IDE RAID
> >> Controller (rev 50)
> >>         Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6421 IDE RAID Controller
> >>         Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 19
> >>         I/O ports at 9400 [size=16]
> >>         I/O ports at 9800 [size=16]
> >>         I/O ports at 9c00 [size=16]
> >>         I/O ports at a000 [size=16]
> >>         I/O ports at a400 [size=32]
> >>         I/O ports at a800 [size=256]
> >>         [virtual] Expansion ROM at e9000000 [disabled] [size=64K]
> >>         Capabilities: [e0] Power Management version 2
> >>
> >> I just noted that the Expansion ROM is disabled, but I didn't see any
> >> jumpers to enable it on the card prior to installing it.  Does anyone
> >> know how this is supposed to work?  I would like to make it directly
> >> bootable but I believe this has to be 'enabled' for that.
> >
> >It's usually normal for it to be disabled after boot, I believe. Are you
> >getting anything showing up on boot indicating its BIOS is active?
>
> No, not a thing.  Also invisible in the mainboards bios config AFAICT.

Normally this option is called "Enable Option ROM" or enable "INT 13/19h 
hook". See if you have such an option. It's surprising this isn't enabled by 
default.

However, the BIOS still might not support directly booting off the controller, 
I'm afraid.

-- 
Cheers,
Alistair.

137/1 Warrender Park Road, Edinburgh, UK.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-15 22:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <fa.JX5deKXb3TDJ1pV6ig+xHviNfRI@ifi.uio.no>
2007-12-15 20:58 ` New question on that sata controller Robert Hancock
2007-12-15 21:24   ` Gene Heskett
2007-12-15 22:17     ` Alistair John Strachan [this message]
2007-12-15 23:15       ` Gene Heskett
2007-12-15  6:49 Gene Heskett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200712152217.28865.alistair@devzero.co.uk \
    --to=alistair@devzero.co.uk \
    --cc=gene.heskett@gmail.com \
    --cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox