From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation>,
protasnb@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings this week
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 21:51:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071217025129.GA12815@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4763F771.10105@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 04:49:05PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Reports about tainted kernels have arguably less value. It would be
> good to hide such reports until a report of the same oops in an
> untainted kernel was found.
I disagree with this. It's useful to have a "we've seen this before,
and every time, it was tainted with xyz module" datapoint, especially
if no untainted copies of that oops turn up.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-17 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-14 18:46 Top kernel oopses/warnings this week Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-14 18:58 ` Dave Jones
2007-12-14 21:57 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-14 22:25 ` Natalie Protasevich
2007-12-15 0:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-14 22:12 ` Jon Masters
2007-12-15 15:49 ` Stefan Richter
2007-12-15 18:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-15 19:44 ` Stefan Richter
2007-12-17 18:25 ` Zach Brown
2007-12-17 18:41 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-17 2:51 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2007-12-17 12:33 ` Jon Masters
2007-12-17 13:13 ` Stefan Richter
2007-12-17 16:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-17 17:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-17 21:36 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-17 21:58 ` Theodore Tso
2007-12-17 22:58 ` Tony Luck
2007-12-17 23:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-17 23:26 ` Tony Luck
2007-12-17 23:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-18 0:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-18 0:39 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-18 2:31 ` Theodore Tso
2007-12-18 6:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-18 17:53 ` Matt Mackall
2007-12-18 18:28 ` Theodore Tso
2007-12-18 18:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-18 10:11 ` Jon Masters
2007-12-18 18:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-18 18:13 ` Matt Mackall
2007-12-18 18:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-18 17:48 ` Matt Mackall
2007-12-18 23:37 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071217025129.GA12815@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=protasnb@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox