From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
glommer@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, ehabkost@redhat.com,
jeremy@goop.org, avi@qumranet.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
ak@suse.de, chrisw@sous-sol.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
hpa@zytor.com, zach@vmware.com, roland@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:38:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071218133818.GA9941@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071218131932.GA9457@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > What's left in processor_32.h and processor_64.h cannot be cleanly
> > integrated. However, it's just a couple of definitions. They are
> > moved to processor.h around ifdefs, and the original files are
> > deleted. Note that there's much less headers included in the final
> > version.
>
> and this patch breaks the build on the attached config, with:
>
> CC arch/x86/mm/boot_ioremap_32.o
> In file included from include/asm/fixmap_32.h:28,
> from include/asm/fixmap.h:2,
> from include/asm/pgtable_32.h:16,
> from include/asm/pgtable.h:2,
> from arch/x86/mm/boot_ioremap_32.c:21:
> include/asm/acpi.h:159: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'acpi_fake_nodes'
> make[1]: *** [arch/x86/mm/boot_ioremap_32.o] Error 1
> make: *** [arch/x86/mm/boot_ioremap_32.o] Error 2
really, please do _much_ more careful unification. We unified two full
architectures in .24-rc1 and there was _not a single regression_ due to
that unification. Not a single build failure, not a single boot or
runtime failure.
here the problem is apparently caused by your patch, a careless
'unification' of include file sections. 32-bit had this:
-#include <asm/vm86.h>
-#include <asm/math_emu.h>
-#include <asm/segment.h>
-#include <asm/page.h>
-#include <asm/types.h>
-#include <asm/sigcontext.h>
-#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
-#include <asm/msr.h>
-#include <asm/system.h>
-#include <linux/threads.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <asm/desc_defs.h>
64-bit had this:
-#include <asm/segment.h>
-#include <asm/page.h>
-#include <asm/types.h>
-#include <asm/sigcontext.h>
-#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
-#include <linux/threads.h>
-#include <asm/msr.h>
-#include <asm/current.h>
-#include <asm/system.h>
-#include <linux/personality.h>
-#include <asm/desc_defs.h>
and the 'unified' processor.h has:
+#include <asm/desc_defs.h>
+#include <asm/msr.h>
#include <asm/page.h>
#include <asm/percpu.h>
#include <asm/system.h>
#include <asm/percpu.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/cache.h>
+#include <linux/personality.h>
Those are visible, _crutial_ differences totally unmentioned in the
patch.
yes, our include file dependencies are a jungle, the differences between
32-bit and 64-bit are arbitrary in 80% of the cases, but still there's
no reason why this couldnt be done correctly. The patch below is a quick
bandaid that adds the missing bits.
Ingo
------------------>
Subject: x86: fix include file mess
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
fix include file mess.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
include/asm-x86/processor.h | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-x86.q/include/asm-x86/processor.h
===================================================================
--- linux-x86.q.orig/include/asm-x86/processor.h
+++ linux-x86.q/include/asm-x86/processor.h
@@ -6,15 +6,27 @@
struct task_struct;
struct mm_struct;
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+# include <asm/math_emu.h>
+# include <asm/vm86.h>
+#endif
+
+#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
+#include <asm/current.h>
#include <asm/desc_defs.h>
#include <asm/msr.h>
#include <asm/page.h>
#include <asm/percpu.h>
+#include <asm/segment.h>
+#include <asm/sigcontext.h>
#include <asm/system.h>
-#include <asm/percpu.h>
-#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <asm/types.h>
+
#include <linux/cache.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/personality.h>
+#include <linux/threads.h>
/*
* Default implementation of macro that returns current
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-18 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-17 22:52 [PATCH 0/21] Integrate processor.h Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 1/21] move tsc definitions to were they belong Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 2/21] [PATCH] get rid of _MASK flags Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 3/21] [PATCH] move desc_empty to where they belong Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 4/21] [PATCH] move load_cr3 to a common place Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 5/21] [PATCH] unify paravirt pieces of processor.h Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 6/21] [PATCH] move the definition of set_iopl_mask to common header Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 7/21] [PATCH] unify common parts of processor.h Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 8/21] [PATCH] unify current_text_addr Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 9/21] [PATCH] unify tss_struct Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 10/21] [PATCH] provide x86_64 with a load_sp0 function Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 11/21] [PATCH] unify thread struct Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 12/21] [PATCH] unify TASK_ALIGN definitions Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 13/21] [PATCH] change bitwise operations to get a void parameter Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 14/21] [PATCH] unify x86_cpuinfo struct Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 15/21] [PATCH] remove legacy stuff from processor_64.h Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 16/21] [PATCH] unify mm_segment_t definition Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 17/21] [PATCH] move definitions to processor.h Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 18/21] [PATCH] unify prefetch operations Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 19/21] [PATCH] unify asm nops Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 20/21] [PATCH] move i387 definitions to processor.h Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-17 22:52 ` [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-18 13:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-18 13:38 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-12-18 13:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-18 13:49 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-18 15:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-18 13:48 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-18 15:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-18 5:18 ` [PATCH 13/21] [PATCH] change bitwise operations to get a void parameter Rusty Russell
2007-12-18 5:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-18 12:40 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-18 17:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-18 11:45 ` [PATCH 7/21] [PATCH] unify common parts of processor.h Ingo Molnar
2007-12-18 12:05 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-18 14:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-18 5:14 ` [PATCH 3/21] [PATCH] move desc_empty to where they belong Rusty Russell
2007-12-18 5:35 ` Roland McGrath
2007-12-18 5:50 ` Roland McGrath
2007-12-18 5:59 ` [PATCH x86/mm] x86: TLS desc_struct cleanup Roland McGrath
2007-12-18 12:03 ` [PATCH 3/21] [PATCH] move desc_empty to where they belong Glauber de Oliveira Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071218133818.GA9941@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox