Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-08T22:12:16Z

On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 01:42:41AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Subject : snd_hda_intel 2.6.24-rc2 bug: interrupts don't always work on Lenovo X60s
> > > Submitter : Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/8/255
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9332
> > > Handled-By :
> > > Patch :
> >
> > Takashi had a patch and that has been merged. AFAIK this regression
> > has been fixed and we're left with a new but harmless warning.
> >
> > However Roland reported other problems and it appears that the trail went
> > cold (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/14/251)
> >
> > Ted was hitting some of the same problems but that trail appears to also
> > have gone cold (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/23/17).
>
> Actually, not gone cold, but I stopped posting about it because it's
> been solved and I thought agreement had been reached that it should be
> pushed to mainline before 2.6.25.
>
> I am very happily running with Ingo's "snd hda suspend latency:
> shorten codec read" patch, which was originally intended to speed up
> resuming from hibernation, but which as I discovered, also has the
> nice side effect of eliminating the reported error.
>
> On 11/23, Takashi replied to my note (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/23/17)
> and suggested that Jaroslav push this patch to Linus immediately
> instead of waiting for 2.6.25, since it appearly solves two problems
> with one stone. However, I just checked, as of Linus's public, and
> Ingo's patch is *not* in mainline.
>
> However, as far as I am concerned, Ingo's patch, first posted to LKML
> here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/16/66 should be listed as fixing
> the above regression. Rafael, could you please make a note of this in
> your regression list,

Done, thanks.

> and could we please get this patch pushed into mainline?