From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Cc: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, ehabkost@redhat.com, jeremy@goop.org,
avi@qumranet.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
ak@suse.de, chrisw@sous-sol.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
hpa@zytor.com, zach@vmware.com, roland@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:45:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071219134546.GA21282@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80712190415q7921b244ua073a8c64ab30597@mail.gmail.com>
* Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@gmail.com> wrote:
> > i fixed it up by hand - the result is below - does it look OK to
> > you? (Also, could you check latest x86.git whether i've picked up
> > all your patches correctly - the reject might be indicative of some
> > missing pieces.)
>
> Your fix is okay. The other patches seems to be all there. The reason
> for this is that it conflicts with Roland's (welcome) i387 patches.
ah, indeed - i forgot about that interaction. Your patches passed a
few hundred random builds and bootups meanwhile so i think they are
now 100% Perfect (tm) :-)
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-19 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-18 20:04 [PATCH] finish processor.h integration Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-18 20:54 ` Frans Pop
2007-12-18 21:00 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-18 21:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-18 21:32 ` Frans Pop
2007-12-19 2:56 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-19 10:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-19 12:15 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-19 13:45 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071219134546.GA21282@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox