From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Pierre Savary <pierre.savary@kerlink.fr>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: syscall in a module
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:16:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071220091605.GC7921@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001c842e7$3f2cd340$bd8679c0$@savary@kerlink.fr>
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:03:53AM +0100, Pierre Savary wrote:
> I need some help about syscalls and modules. In fact I want to adapt the
> g_file_storage module to my own application.
> I need to use "sys_umount" and "sys_mount" but when I compile I obtain this
> message :
> [...]
> Kernel: arch/arm/boot/zImage is ready
> Building modules, stage 2.
> MODPOST 4 modules
> ERROR: "sys_umount" [drivers/usb/gadget/g_file_storage.ko] undefined!
> make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
> make: *** [modules] Error 2
> [...]
>
> So, how can I use "sys_umount" and "sys_mount" in this module?
You don't. Syscalls are NOT for modules because they modify the
filesystem, which depends on the user context. For example, processes
running chroot have a different view of the filesystem from those which
aren't - and if you happen to be executing with the context of a
chrooted user process when you mount, and a non-chrooted process when
you umount.
I suggest you describe what you're trying to do in greater detail, and/or
ask on the main kernel list - but note that if you ask the same question
without explaining why you need it _and_ asking for alternative ideas,
you'll get the same kind of response there.
next parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-20 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <000001c842e7$3f2cd340$bd8679c0$@savary@kerlink.fr>
2007-12-20 9:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
[not found] ` <000401c842ea$5aef1ea0$10cd5be0$@savary@kerlink.fr>
2007-12-20 10:15 ` syscall in a module Russell King - ARM Linux
[not found] ` <001101c842f6$3793a4b0$a6baee10$@savary@kerlink.fr>
2007-12-27 16:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071220091605.GC7921@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre.savary@kerlink.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox