* [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 1/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG: introduce PCI_USING_MMCONF]
@ 2007-12-20 12:23 Tony Camuso
2007-12-20 14:19 ` Tony Camuso
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tony Camuso @ 2007-12-20 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh, linux-kernel, linux-pci
To all,
The next few forwarded messages comprise my responses to Greg's
questions about the patch I submitted to deal with pci devices
that do not respond correctly to x86 mmconf accesses.
Please accept my apologies for not having including the community
in my original responses.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG: introduce PCI_USING_MMCONF
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:58:45 -0500
From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@redhat.com>
Reply-To: tcamuso@redhat.com
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
References:
<20071219221746.20362.39243.sendpatchset@dhcp83-188.boston.redhat.com>
<20071219221751.20362.23451.sendpatchset@dhcp83-188.boston.redhat.com>
<20071219230447.GA24219@suse.de>
Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 05:17:51PM -0500, tcamuso@redhat.com wrote:
>>
>> +extern struct pci_ops pci_legacy_ops; /* direct.c */
>
> This isn't needed in this patch at all, and might make the compiler
> confused if you were to build with only this patch present :(
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Yes, of course. I missed that. Thank you.
Should I resubmit that one patch? Or would you prefer I resubmit
the whole patch set?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 1/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG: introduce PCI_USING_MMCONF]
2007-12-20 12:23 [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 1/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG: introduce PCI_USING_MMCONF] Tony Camuso
@ 2007-12-20 14:19 ` Tony Camuso
2007-12-20 16:48 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tony Camuso @ 2007-12-20 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh, linux-kernel, linux-pci
Tony Camuso wrote:
>
> Greg KH wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 05:17:51PM -0500, tcamuso@redhat.com wrote:
>>>
>>> +extern struct pci_ops pci_legacy_ops; /* direct.c */
>>
>> This isn't needed in this patch at all, and might make the compiler
>> confused if you were to build with only this patch present :(
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>
> Yes, of course. I missed that. Thank you.
>
I take that back.
This struct must be declared extern because it is referenced in
arch/x86/pci/common.c by pcibios_fix_bus_scan_quirk()
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 1/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG: introduce PCI_USING_MMCONF]
2007-12-20 14:19 ` Tony Camuso
@ 2007-12-20 16:48 ` Greg KH
2007-12-20 17:00 ` Tony Camuso
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2007-12-20 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tony Camuso; +Cc: gregkh, linux-kernel, linux-pci
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 09:19:00AM -0500, Tony Camuso wrote:
> Tony Camuso wrote:
>
>> Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 05:17:51PM -0500, tcamuso@redhat.com wrote:
>>>> +extern struct pci_ops pci_legacy_ops; /* direct.c */
>>>
>>> This isn't needed in this patch at all, and might make the compiler
>>> confused if you were to build with only this patch present :(
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>> Yes, of course. I missed that. Thank you.
> I take that back.
>
> This struct must be declared extern because it is referenced in
> arch/x86/pci/common.c by pcibios_fix_bus_scan_quirk()
Sure, but you do not reference it in this patch, right? So it's not
needed until you actually use it, so just include it in the patch that
you are needing it in.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-20 17:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-12-20 12:23 [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 1/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG: introduce PCI_USING_MMCONF] Tony Camuso
2007-12-20 14:19 ` Tony Camuso
2007-12-20 16:48 ` Greg KH
2007-12-20 17:00 ` Tony Camuso
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox