From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756749AbXLTSxh (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:53:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753498AbXLTSxZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:53:25 -0500 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.171.30]:44463 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752973AbXLTSxY (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:53:24 -0500 From: akepner@sgi.com Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:51:54 -0800 To: Stefan Richter Cc: Andrew Morton , grundler@parisc-linux.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, jes@sgi.com, randy.dunlap@oracle.com, rdreier@cisco.com, James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] dma: passing "attributes" to dma_map_* routines Message-ID: <20071220185154.GK412@sgi.com> References: <20071218001758.GO21916@sgi.com> <4767FA62.9060002@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20071218200759.GE412@sgi.com> <476834AC.9050401@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <476834AC.9050401@s5r6.in-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 09:59:24PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote: > .... > So that would be option 3) of yours, though without your attrs > parameter. Do you expect the need for even more flags for other kinds > of special behavior? I was hoping to keep the option of adding additional flags, but for now there's no obvious need for other flags that I'm aware of. -- Arthur