From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@bohmer.net,
jonathan@jonmasters.org, matthias.kaehlcke@gmail.com,
kjwinchester@gmail.com, zaitcev@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] usb: libusual: locking cleanup
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:24:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071221222428.a75a5a34.zaitcev@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071221205859.316759032@mvista.com>
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:00:04 -0800, Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:
> I converted the usu_init_notify semaphore to normal mutex usage, and it
> should still prevent the request_module before the init routine is
> complete. Before it acted more like a complete, now the mutex protects
> two distinct section from running at the same time..
Let's see.
> @@ -178,10 +179,7 @@ static int usu_probe_thread(void *arg)
> int rc;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - /* A completion does not work here because it's counted. */
> - down(&usu_init_notify);
> - up(&usu_init_notify);
> -
> + mutex_lock(&usu_probe_mutex);
> rc = request_module(bias_names[type]);
When I tried it, usb-storage would not load with unresolved symbols.
It happens if child (usu_probe_thread) runs ahead of its parent
(usb_usual_init -> usb_register -> usu_probe). It's entirely possible,
depending on your scheduler.
I hate this down-up trick too, so if you have a better idea, I'm all ears.
-- Pete
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-22 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20071221205848.989157559@mvista.com>
2007-12-21 8:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] usb microtek: remove unused semaphore Daniel Walker
2007-12-21 8:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] prism54: remove questionable down_interruptible usage Daniel Walker
2007-12-21 8:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] docs: convert kref semaphore to mutex Daniel Walker
2007-12-21 21:33 ` Corey Minyard
2007-12-21 8:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] usb: libusual: locking cleanup Daniel Walker
2007-12-22 4:22 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-22 6:24 ` Pete Zaitcev [this message]
2007-12-22 6:31 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-22 17:01 ` Daniel Walker
2007-12-23 7:37 ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-12-23 16:46 ` Daniel Walker
2007-12-24 14:12 ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-12-24 16:04 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071221222428.a75a5a34.zaitcev@redhat.com \
--to=zaitcev@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=kjwinchester@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@bohmer.net \
--cc=matthias.kaehlcke@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox