public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@bohmer.net,
	jonathan@jonmasters.org, matthias.kaehlcke@gmail.com,
	kjwinchester@gmail.com, zaitcev@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] usb: libusual: locking cleanup
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:24:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071221222428.a75a5a34.zaitcev@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071221205859.316759032@mvista.com>

On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:00:04 -0800, Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:

> I converted the usu_init_notify semaphore to normal mutex usage, and it 
> should still prevent the request_module before the init routine is
> complete. Before it acted more like a complete, now the mutex protects
> two distinct section from running at the same time..

Let's see.

> @@ -178,10 +179,7 @@ static int usu_probe_thread(void *arg)
>  	int rc;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> -	/* A completion does not work here because it's counted. */
> -	down(&usu_init_notify);
> -	up(&usu_init_notify);
> -
> +	mutex_lock(&usu_probe_mutex);
>  	rc = request_module(bias_names[type]);

When I tried it, usb-storage would not load with unresolved symbols.
It happens if child (usu_probe_thread) runs ahead of its parent
(usb_usual_init -> usb_register -> usu_probe). It's entirely possible,
depending on your scheduler.

I hate this down-up trick too, so if you have a better idea, I'm all ears.

-- Pete

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-12-22  6:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20071221205848.989157559@mvista.com>
2007-12-21  8:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] usb microtek: remove unused semaphore Daniel Walker
2007-12-21  8:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] prism54: remove questionable down_interruptible usage Daniel Walker
2007-12-21  8:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] docs: convert kref semaphore to mutex Daniel Walker
2007-12-21 21:33   ` Corey Minyard
2007-12-21  8:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] usb: libusual: locking cleanup Daniel Walker
2007-12-22  4:22   ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-22  6:24   ` Pete Zaitcev [this message]
2007-12-22  6:31     ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-22 17:01     ` Daniel Walker
2007-12-23  7:37       ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-12-23 16:46         ` Daniel Walker
2007-12-24 14:12           ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-12-24 16:04             ` Daniel Walker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071221222428.a75a5a34.zaitcev@redhat.com \
    --to=zaitcev@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
    --cc=kjwinchester@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@bohmer.net \
    --cc=matthias.kaehlcke@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox