From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756150AbXLWR6R (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Dec 2007 12:58:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753310AbXLWR6G (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Dec 2007 12:58:06 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:49377 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753287AbXLWR6F (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Dec 2007 12:58:05 -0500 Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 18:57:29 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Carlos Corbacho , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Greg KH , Thomas Gleixner , Len Brown , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM Message-ID: <20071223175729.GA7152@elte.hu> References: <200712231419.40207.carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk> <200712231730.34935.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200712231730.34935.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > 0x1500 has been picked here as a nice, round and more conservative > > value than 0x4000, and which covers 0x142E. > > The patch is fine by me, so if anyone has objections, please speak up. i'm quite nervous about that approach, partly due to the "black magic" interaction of commit 2ba84684e8c. Could we try to figure out what's really going on here, instead of playing with a general limit (which might break other boxes)? Ingo