public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>,
	jgarzik@pobox.com, Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	wingel@nano-system.com,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
	james.smart@emulex.com, linux-driver@qlogic.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 4/4] [POWERPC] pci: Disable IO/Mem on a device when resources can't be allocated
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 00:23:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071224072301.GD3758@colo.lackof.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071217230127.46B3BDDE38@ozlabs.org>

On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:01:15AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> This patch changes the PowerPC PCI code to disable IO and/or Memory
> decoding on a PCI device when a resource of that type failed to be
> allocated. This is done to avoid having unallocated dangling BARs enabled
> that might try to decode on top of other devices.
> 
> If a proper resource is assigned later on, then pci_enable_device{,_io,_mem}
> will take care of re-enabling decoding.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
....
> @@ -1062,8 +1065,12 @@ static void __init pcibios_allocate_reso
>  				disabled = !(command & PCI_COMMAND_IO);
>  			else
>  				disabled = !(command & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY);
> -			if (pass == disabled)
> -				alloc_resource(dev, idx);
> +			if (pass == disabled && alloc_resource(dev, idx)) {
> +				command &= ~(r->flags & (IORESOURCE_IO |
> +							 IORESOURCE_MEM));

While this may be ok for PPC, in general, wouldn't we want to only disable
which ever type of resource that couldn't be allocated?
ie make two calls: alloc_resource_io() and alloc_resource_mem() and disable
the respective flag if the alloc call fails?
Thus a device which was enable and programmed by BIOS could remain functional
despite one resource not being allocated.
(e.g. MMIO was allocated successfully while IO Port space was not)

Again, this is just a hypothetical question since I have no example (yet)
off hand where this is true. ISTR, the original discussion around
pci_enable_device_bars() suggested some machines already have this issue.

cheers,
grant

> +				pci_write_config_word(dev,
> +						      PCI_COMMAND, command);
> +			}
>  		}
>  		if (pass)
>  			continue;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-12-24  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-17 23:01 [RFC/PATCH 1/4] pci: Add pci_enable_device_{io,mem} intefaces Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-17 23:01 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/4] pci: Remove pci_enable_device_bars() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-24  7:08   ` Grant Grundler
2007-12-25 21:16     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-17 23:01 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/4] pci: Remove users of pci_enable_device_bars() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-18  0:07   ` Alan Cox
2007-12-18  0:26     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-24  7:13   ` Grant Grundler
2007-12-17 23:01 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/4] [POWERPC] pci: Disable IO/Mem on a device when resources can't be allocated Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-18  9:56   ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2007-12-18 11:36     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-24  7:23   ` Grant Grundler [this message]
2007-12-25 21:20     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-25 21:26       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-27 21:03         ` Grant Grundler
2007-12-17 23:49 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/4] pci: Add pci_enable_device_{io,mem} intefaces Johannes Weiner
2007-12-17 23:55   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-18  0:02   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-18  9:37     ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2007-12-18  9:43       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-19  5:10       ` [RFC/PATCH]] x86: pci: Disable IO/Mem on a device when resources can't be allocated Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-19 13:43         ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2007-12-19 20:29           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071224072301.GD3758@colo.lackof.org \
    --to=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=alan@redhat.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=james.smart@emulex.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-driver@qlogic.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    --cc=wingel@nano-system.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox