From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Carlos Corbacho <carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 14:44:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200712241444.24031.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200712240305.18080.carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk>
On Monday, 24 of December 2007, Carlos Corbacho wrote:
> On Monday 24 December 2007 01:14:34 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Side note: we could obviously undo the commit that triggered this for you
> > [..]
> > In other words, we'd have to go back to our original ordering, which Len
> > said was fundamentally wrong. I don't think anybody really wants that.
>
> Nor would I argue to do so.
>
> > It would be better to figure out why "device_suspend()" apparently causes
> > problems for your AML crud.
>
> Will do - thanks for the pointer.
Well, having considered that for a longer while, I think the AML code is
referring to a device that we have suspended already, and since it's in a low
power state, it just can't handle the reference.
If that is the case, we'll have to find the device (that should be possible
using some code instrumentation) and move the suspending of it into the late
stage.
> > Oh, and why is linux-kernel cc'd, but not linux-pm?
>
> Because I like to compound my errors (I mean, if you're going to screw up, you
> might as well _really_ go for it).
BTW, linux-pm is on linux-foundation, changed the CC. ;-)
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-24 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200712231419.40207.carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk>
2007-12-23 16:30 ` x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-23 17:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-23 18:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-23 22:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-23 23:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-24 0:09 ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-24 0:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-24 1:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-24 3:05 ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-24 13:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2007-12-24 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-24 21:53 ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-25 16:13 ` Suspend code ordering (again) (was: Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM) Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-26 4:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-26 15:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-26 15:24 ` Suspend code ordering (again) Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-12-26 17:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-25 12:12 ` x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM Pavel Machek
2007-12-25 12:28 ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-23 17:53 ` [Bug 9528] " Linus Torvalds
2007-12-23 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-23 19:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-23 19:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-23 20:43 ` Yinghai Lu
[not found] <fa.Tr7qmPdet0rF2FSRX/94s2UEMSE@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.5MPS0t6OtOOALbc90ywKDrtik+4@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.zg2cR0292Evub+o7LgQUdg4A7ZM@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.ZBHAMdWAEaW7Flaz8/Gc8PLZUNg@ifi.uio.no>
2007-12-24 22:40 ` Robert Hancock
2007-12-25 0:03 ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-25 13:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-25 13:12 ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-25 14:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-25 17:17 ` Robert Hancock
2007-12-25 18:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-26 4:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-26 5:13 ` Robert Hancock
2007-12-26 7:23 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200712241444.24031.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox