From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752565AbXLXPay (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Dec 2007 10:30:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751162AbXLXPaq (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Dec 2007 10:30:46 -0500 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:48425 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751082AbXLXPaq (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Dec 2007 10:30:46 -0500 Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 16:31:52 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Julia Lawall Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/38] arch/x86/ia32: Use time_before, time_before_eq, etc. Message-ID: <20071224153152.GA21971@one.firstfloor.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 03:23:19PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > From: Julia Lawall > > The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq > are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values. The old code was actually correct I think, but the change is ok for me. -Andi