linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Adrian Bunk <adrian.bunk@movial.fi>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
	phil.el@wanadoo.fr, oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:57:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071228195724.GA22797@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071228185636.GA4738@stusta.de>

On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 08:56:36PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch restores the ARMv6 OProfile support that was killed by
> commit 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <adrian.bunk@movial.fi>

Given where we are in the release cycle, I think this "cleanup" patch
should be reverted.  Once the issues with it are resolved (why was it
never even CC'd to the arch maintainers for review?) then it can go
into mainline.

Note that it also looks like (from the commitdiff) that the above
mentioned commit also removes:

CONFIG_HARDWARE_PM (blackfin)
CONFIG_OPROFILE_CELL (powerpc)

So they're probably subtly broken as well.

Linus, what do you think?  Should 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9
be reverted?

> 
> ---
> 
>  kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
> 7fc221ef169610b5eac98e2ddd641811c0d53e4a 
> diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation b/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
> index 468f47a..4453187 100644
> --- a/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
> +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
> @@ -29,2 +29,17 @@ config OPROFILE
> 
> +config OPROFILE_ARMV6
> +	bool
> +	depends on OPROFILE && ARM && CPU_V6 && !SMP
> +	default y
> +	select OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
> +
> +config OPROFILE_MPCORE
> +	bool
> +	depends on OPROFILE && ARM && CPU_V6 && SMP
> +	default y
> +	select OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
> +
> +config OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
> +	bool
> +
>  config KPROBES

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-12-28 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-28 18:56 [2.6.24 patch] restore ARMv6 OProfile support Adrian Bunk
2007-12-28 19:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-12-28 19:57 ` Russell King [this message]
2007-12-29 16:05 ` [2.6.24 patch] Fix " Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-12-29 18:06   ` Randy Dunlap
2007-12-29 22:00     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-01-02 17:43   ` Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071228195724.GA22797@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=adrian.bunk@movial.fi \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=phil.el@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).