[patch 2.6.24-rc6-mm 6/9] gpiolib: pcf857x i2c gpio expander support

David Brownell
2007-12-29T04:06:49Z

From: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>

This is a new-style I2C driver for most common 8 and 16 bit I2C based
"quasi-bidirectional" GPIO expanders: pcf8574 or pcf8575, and several
compatible models (mostly faster, supporting I2C at up to 1 MHz).

The driver exposes the GPIO signals using the platform-neutral GPIO
programming interface, so they are easily accessed by other kernel code.
The lack of such a flexible kernel API has been a big factor in the
proliferation of board-specific drivers for these chips... stuff that
rarely makes it upstream since it's so ugly. This driver will let such
boards use standard calls.

Since it's a new-style driver, these devices must be configured as
part of board-specific init. That eliminates the need for error-prone
manual configuration of module parameters, and makes compatibility with
legacy drivers (pcf8574.c, pc8575.c) for these chips easier (there's
a clear either/or disjunction).

Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
---
drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 23 +++
drivers/gpio/Makefile | 2
drivers/gpio/pcf857x.c | 330 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/i2c/pcf857x.h | 45 ++++++
4 files changed, 400 insertions(+)

--- at91.orig/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
+++ at91/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
@@ -27,6 +27,29 @@ config DEBUG_GPIO

comment "I2C GPIO expanders:"

+config GPIO_PCF857X
+ tristate "PCF857x, PCA857x, and PCA967x I2C GPIO expanders"
+ depends on I2C
+ help
+ Say yes here to provide access to most "quasi-bidirectional" I2C
+ GPIO expanders used for additional digital outputs or inputs.
+ Most of these parts are from NXP, though TI is a second source for
+ some of them. Compatible models include:
+
+ 8 bits: pcf8574, pcf8574a, pca8574, pca8574a,
+ pca9670, pca9672, pca9674, pca9674a
+
+ 16 bits: pcf8575, pcf8575c, pca8575,
+ pca9671, pca9673, pca9675
+
+ Your board setup code will need to declare the expanders in
+ use, and assign numbers to the GPIOs they expose. Those GPIOs
+ can then be used from drivers and other kernel code, just like
+ other GPIOs, but only accessible from task contexts.
+
+ This driver provides an in-kernel interface to those GPIOs using
+ platform-neutral GPIO calls.
+
comment "SPI GPIO expanders:"

endmenu
--- at91.orig/drivers/gpio/Makefile
+++ at91/drivers/gpio/Makefile
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
# gpio support: dedicated expander chips, etc

+obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_PCF857X) += pcf857x.o
+
ifeq ($(CONFIG_DEBUG_GPIO),y)
EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DDEBUG
endif
--- /dev/null
+++ at91/drivers/gpio/pcf857x.c
@@ -0,0 +1,330 @@
+/*
+ * pcf857x - driver for pcf857x, pca857x, and pca967x I2C GPIO expanders
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2007 David Brownell
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ * (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+ * Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/i2c/pcf857x.h>
+
+#include <asm/gpio.h>
+
+
+/*
+ * The pcf857x, pca857x, and pca967x chips only expose one read and one
+ * write register. Writing a "one" bit (to match the reset state) lets
+ * that pin be used as an input; it's not an open-drain model, but acts
+ * a bit like one. This is described as "quasi-bidirectional"; read the
+ * chip documentation for details.
+ *
+ * Many other I2C GPIO expander chips (like the pca953x models) have
+ * more complex register models and more conventional circuitry using
+ * push/pull drivers. They often use the same 0x20..0x27 addresses as
+ * pcf857x parts, making the "legacy" I2C driver model problematic.
+ */
+struct pcf857x {
+ struct gpio_chip chip;
+ struct i2c_client *client;
+ unsigned out; /* software latch */
+};
+
+/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
+
+/* Talk to 8-bit I/O expander */
+
+static int pcf857x_input8(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
+{
+ struct pcf857x *gpio = container_of(chip, struct pcf857x, chip);
+
+ gpio->out |= (1 << offset);
+ return i2c_smbus_write_byte(gpio->client, gpio->out);
+}
+
+static int pcf857x_get8(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
+{
+ struct pcf857x *gpio = container_of(chip, struct pcf857x, chip);
+ s32 value;
+
+ value = i2c_smbus_read_byte(gpio->client);
+ return (value < 0) ? 0 : (value & (1 << offset));
+}
+
+static int pcf857x_output8(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value)
+{
+ struct pcf857x *gpio = container_of(chip, struct pcf857x, chip);
+ unsigned bit = 1 << offset;
+
+ if (value)
+ gpio->out |= bit;
+ else
+ gpio->out &= ~bit;
+ return i2c_smbus_write_byte(gpio->client, gpio->out);
+}
+
+static void pcf857x_set8(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value)
+{
+ pcf857x_output8(chip, offset, value);
+}
+
+/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
+
+/* Talk to 16-bit I/O expander */
+
+static int i2c_write_le16(struct i2c_client *client, u16 word)
+{
+ u8 buf[2] = { word & 0xff, word >> 8, };
+ int status;
+
+ status = i2c_master_send(client, buf, 2);
+ return (status < 0) ? status : 0;
+}
+
+static int i2c_read_le16(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ u8 buf[2];
+ int status;
+
+ status = i2c_master_recv(client, buf, 2);
+ if (status < 0)
+ return status;
+ return (buf[1] << 8) | buf[0];
+}
+
+static int pcf857x_input16(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
+{
+ struct pcf857x *gpio = container_of(chip, struct pcf857x, chip);
+
+ gpio->out |= (1 << offset);
+ return i2c_write_le16(gpio->client, gpio->out);
+}
+
+static int pcf857x_get16(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
+{
+ struct pcf857x *gpio = container_of(chip, struct pcf857x, chip);
+ int value;
+
+ value = i2c_read_le16(gpio->client);
+ return (value < 0) ? 0 : (value & (1 << offset));
+}
+
+static int pcf857x_output16(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value)
+{
+ struct pcf857x *gpio = container_of(chip, struct pcf857x, chip);
+ unsigned bit = 1 << offset;
+
+ if (value)
+ gpio->out |= bit;
+ else
+ gpio->out &= ~bit;
+ return i2c_write_le16(gpio->client, gpio->out);
+}
+
+static void pcf857x_set16(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value)
+{
+ pcf857x_output16(chip, offset, value);
+}
+
+/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
+
+static int pcf857x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ struct pcf857x_platform_data *pdata;
+ struct pcf857x *gpio;
+ int status;
+
+ pdata = client->dev.platform_data;
+ if (!pdata)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ /* Allocate, initialize, and register this gpio_chip. */
+ gpio = kzalloc(sizeof *gpio, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!gpio)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ gpio->chip.base = pdata->gpio_base;
+ gpio->chip.can_sleep = 1;
+
+ /* NOTE: the OnSemi jlc1562b is also largely compatible with
+ * these parts, notably for output. It has a low-resolution
+ * DAC instead of pin change IRQs; and its inputs can be the
+ * result of comparators.
+ */
+
+ /* 8574 addresses are 0x20..0x27; 8574a uses 0x38..0x3f;
+ * 9670, 9672, 9764, and 9764a use quite a variety.
+ *
+ * NOTE: we don't distinguish here between *4 and *4a parts.
+ */
+ if (strcmp(client->name, "pcf8574") == 0
+ || strcmp(client->name, "pca8574") == 0
+ || strcmp(client->name, "pca9670") == 0
+ || strcmp(client->name, "pca9672") == 0
+ || strcmp(client->name, "pca9674") == 0
+ ) {
+ gpio->chip.ngpio = 8;
+ gpio->chip.direction_input = pcf857x_input8;
+ gpio->chip.get = pcf857x_get8;
+ gpio->chip.direction_output = pcf857x_output8;
+ gpio->chip.set = pcf857x_set8;
+
+ if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter,
+ I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE))
+ status = -EIO;
+
+ /* fail if there's no chip present */
+ else
+ status = i2c_smbus_read_byte(client);
+
+ /* '75/'75c addresses are 0x20..0x27, just like the '74;
+ * the '75c doesn't have a current source pulling high.
+ * 9671, 9673, and 9765 use quite a variety of addresses.
+ *
+ * NOTE: we don't distinguish here between '75 and '75c parts.
+ */
+ } else if (strcmp(client->name, "pcf8575") == 0
+ || strcmp(client->name, "pca8575") == 0
+ || strcmp(client->name, "pca9671") == 0
+ || strcmp(client->name, "pca9673") == 0
+ || strcmp(client->name, "pca9675") == 0
+ ) {
+ gpio->chip.ngpio = 16;
+ gpio->chip.direction_input = pcf857x_input16;
+ gpio->chip.get = pcf857x_get16;
+ gpio->chip.direction_output = pcf857x_output16;
+ gpio->chip.set = pcf857x_set16;
+
+ if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C))
+ status = -EIO;
+
+ /* fail if there's no chip present */
+ else
+ status = i2c_read_le16(client);
+
+ } else
+ status = -ENODEV;
+
+ if (status < 0)
+ goto fail;
+
+ gpio->chip.label = client->name;
+
+ gpio->client = client;
+ i2c_set_clientdata(client, gpio);
+
+ /* NOTE: these chips have strange "quasi-bidirectional" I/O pins.
+ * We can't actually know whether a pin is configured (a) as output
+ * and driving the signal low, or (b) as input and reporting a low
+ * value ... without knowing the last value written since the chip
+ * came out of reset (if any). We can't read the latched output.
+ *
+ * In short, the only reliable solution for setting up pin direction
+ * is to do it explicitly. The setup() method can do that, but it
+ * may cause transient glitching since it can't know the last value
+ * written (some pins may need to be driven low).
+ *
+ * Using pdata->n_latch avoids that trouble. When left initialized
+ * to zero, our software copy of the "latch" then matches the chip's
+ * all-ones reset state. Otherwise it flags pins to be driven low.
+ */
+ gpio->out = ~pdata->n_latch;
+
+ status = gpiochip_add(&gpio->chip);
+ if (status < 0)
+ goto fail;
+
+ /* NOTE: these chips can issue "some pin-changed" IRQs, which we
+ * don't yet even try to use. Among other issues, the relevant
+ * genirq state isn't available to modular drivers; and most irq
+ * methods can't be called from sleeping contexts.
+ */
+
+ dev_info(&client->dev, "gpios %d..%d on a %s%s\n",
+ gpio->chip.base,
+ gpio->chip.base + gpio->chip.ngpio - 1,
+ client->name,
+ client->irq ? " (irq ignored)" : "");
+
+ /* Let platform code set up the GPIOs and their users.
+ * Now is the first time anyone could use them.
+ */
+ if (pdata->setup) {
+ status = pdata->setup(client,
+ gpio->chip.base, gpio->chip.ngpio,
+ pdata->context);
+ if (status < 0)
+ dev_warn(&client->dev, "setup --> %d\n", status);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+fail:
+ dev_dbg(&client->dev, "probe error %d for '%s'\n",
+ status, client->name);
+ kfree(gpio);
+ return status;
+}
+
+static int pcf857x_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ struct pcf857x_platform_data *pdata = client->dev.platform_data;
+ struct pcf857x *gpio = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+ int status = 0;
+
+ if (pdata->teardown) {
+ status = pdata->teardown(client,
+ gpio->chip.base, gpio->chip.ngpio,
+ pdata->context);
+ if (status < 0) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "%s --> %d\n",
+ "teardown", status);
+ return status;
+ }
+ }
+
+ status = gpiochip_remove(&gpio->chip);
+ if (status == 0)
+ kfree(gpio);
+ else
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "%s --> %d\n", "remove", status);
+ return status;
+}
+
+static struct i2c_driver pcf857x_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "pcf857x",
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ },
+ .probe = pcf857x_probe,
+ .remove = pcf857x_remove,
+};
+
+static int __init pcf857x_init(void)
+{
+ return i2c_add_driver(&pcf857x_driver);
+}
+module_init(pcf857x_init);
+
+static void __exit pcf857x_exit(void)
+{
+ i2c_del_driver(&pcf857x_driver);
+}
+module_exit(pcf857x_exit);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("David Brownell");
--- /dev/null
+++ at91/include/linux/i2c/pcf857x.h
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+#ifndef __LINUX_PCF857X_H
+#define __LINUX_PCF857X_H
+
+/**
+ * struct pcf857x_platform_data - data to set up pcf857x driver
+ * @gpio_base: number of the chip's first GPIO
+ * @n_latch: optional bit-inverse of initial register value; if
+ * you leave this initialized to zero the driver will act
+ * like the chip was just reset
+ * @setup: optional callback issued once the GPIOs are valid
+ * @teardown: optional callback issued before the GPIOs are invalidated
+ * @context: optional parameter passed to setup() and teardown()
+ *
+ * In addition to the I2C_BOARD_INFO() state appropriate to each chip,
+ * the i2c_board_info used with the pcf875x driver must provide the
+ * chip "type" ("pcf8574", "pcf8574a", "pcf8575", "pcf8575c") and its
+ * platform_data (pointer to one of these structures) with at least
+ * the gpio_base value initialized.
+ *
+ * The @setup callback may be used with the kind of board-specific glue
+ * which hands the (now-valid) GPIOs to other drivers, or which puts
+ * devices in their initial states using these GPIOs.
+ *
+ * These GPIO chips are only "quasi-bidirectional"; read the chip specs
+ * to understand the behavior. They don't have separate registers to
+ * record which pins are used for input or output, record which output
+ * values are driven, or provide access to input values. That must be
+ * inferred by reading the chip's value and knowing the last value written
+ * to it. If you leave n_latch initialized to zero, that last written
+ * value is presumed to be all ones (as if the chip were just reset).
+ */
+struct pcf857x_platform_data {
+ unsigned gpio_base;
+ unsigned n_latch;
+
+ int (*setup)(struct i2c_client *client,
+ int gpio, unsigned ngpio,
+ void *context);
+ int (*teardown)(struct i2c_client *client,
+ int gpio, unsigned ngpio,
+ void *context);
+ void *context;
+};
+
+#endif /* __LINUX_PCF857X_H */