From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] x86 makefile unification and cleaning
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:38:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071229203836.GA21020@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
Since first posting I have updated the patch like this:
o Fixed a few bugs shown up by more extensive testing
o Avoided one ifdef group
o Added a few more comments
o Removed and/or updated a few comments
On top of that I did a few more patches:
Sam Ravnborg (5):
x86: unification of arch/x86/Makefiles
x86: share more options between 32 and 64 bit build
x86: biarch support for 32 bit builds beautified
x86: teach vdso to clean
x86: teach vdso to clean
The resulting diffstat:
arch/x86/Makefile | 244 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/x86/Makefile_32 | 181 -----------------------------------
arch/x86/Makefile_64 | 141 ----------------------------
arch/x86/boot/Makefile | 4 +-
arch/x86/vdso/Makefile | 2 +
5 files changed, 243 insertions(+), 329 deletions(-)
I'm pretty satisfied with the result.
But I hope someone can look into the cpu specific stuff
and merge the remaining bits from 64 bit to the currently 32 bit
only Makefile_32.cpu file.
This will benefit readability and UML I think.
The patches are made on top of the mm branch of the x86 tree.
Patches follows.
Sam
next reply other threads:[~2007-12-29 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-29 20:38 Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2007-12-29 20:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: unification of arch/x86/Makefiles Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-29 20:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: share more options between 32 and 64 bit build Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-29 20:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: biarch support for 32 bit builds beautified Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-29 20:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: teach vdso to clean Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-29 20:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] " Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-29 20:44 ` [PATCH 0/5] x86 makefile unification and cleaning Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-30 14:45 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071229203836.GA21020@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox