From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/3] sched: hrtick and rt group scheduling
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:27:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071231092738.GA30380@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071231001137.147986000@chello.nl>
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> I spend xmas implementing group scheduling for the realtime scheduling
> classes. Its a tad raw, but seems to work for the trivial test cases I
> threw at it.
>
> The hrtick stuff is unrelated but was still stuck in my sched queue.
thanks Peter, this is really cool stuff! I have picked up all 3 patches
into sched-devel.git - let's see how they work out.
(btw., i had to do the fixes below. Are you sure you sent the right
version of the patches?)
Ingo
Index: linux/kernel/sched_rt.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ linux/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -337,7 +337,6 @@ static void dequeue_rt_entity(struct sch
{
struct rt_rq *rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
- struct rt_rq *group_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
list_del_init(&rt_se->run_list);
if (list_empty(array->queue + rt_se_prio(rt_se)))
@@ -527,10 +526,8 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_tas
do {
rt_se = pick_next_rt_entity(rq, rt_rq);
- if (unlikely(!rt_se)) {
- foo = 1;
+ if (unlikely(!rt_se))
goto retry;
- }
rt_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
} while (rt_rq);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-31 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-31 0:11 [RFC/PATCH 0/3] sched: hrtick and rt group scheduling Peter Zijlstra
2007-12-31 0:11 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/3] sched: high-res preemption tick Peter Zijlstra
2007-12-31 0:11 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/3] sched: rt time limit Peter Zijlstra
2007-12-31 0:11 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/3] sched: rt group scheduling Peter Zijlstra
2007-12-31 9:27 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-12-31 13:51 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/3] sched: hrtick and " Balbir Singh
2007-12-31 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071231092738.GA30380@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox