From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755654AbYAANvv (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:51:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755455AbYAANug (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:50:36 -0500 Received: from smtp4.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.153.38]:37183 "EHLO smtp4.pp.htv.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755395AbYAANuf (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:50:35 -0500 Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:50:21 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Miles Bader Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Status of the v850 port? Message-ID: <20080101135021.GT2360@does.not.exist> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Trying to compile the v850 port brings you many compile errors, one of them exists since at least kernel 2.6.19. Are there any patches in some external tree that should be merged? Or will anyone work on getting this port back into a usable state in the forseeable future? Otherwise the only reasonable option would be to remove this port from the kernel sources since it is dead code. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed