From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2)
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:52:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080102105217.GA14731@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200801020032.45529.rjw@sisk.pl>
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some device drivers register CPU hotplug notifiers and use them to
> destroy device objects when removing the corresponding CPUs and to
> create these objects when adding the CPUs back.
>
> Unfortunately, this is not the right thing to do during
> suspend/hibernation, since in that cases the CPU hotplug notifiers are
> called after suspending devices and before resuming them, so the
> operations in question are carried out on the objects representing
> suspended devices which shouldn't be unregistered behing the PM core's
> back. Although right now it usually doesn't lead to any practical
> complications, it will predictably deadlock if
> gregkh-driver-pm-acquire-device-locks-prior-to-suspending.patch is
> applied.
>
> The solution is to prevent drivers from removing/adding devices from
> within CPU hotplug notifiers during suspend/hibernation using the
> FROZEN bit in the notifier's action argument. However, this has to be
> done with care, since the devices objects related to the nonboot CPUs
> that failed to go online during resume should not be present in the
> system. For this reason, it seems reasonable to introduce a mechanism
> allowing drivers to ask the PM core to remove device objects
> corresponding to suspended devices on their behalf.
>
> The first patch in the series introduces such a mechanism. The
> remaining three patches modify the MSR, x86-64 MCE and cpuid drivers
> in accordance with the above approach.
btw., it would be really, really cool if there was a scriptable way i
could test suspend/resume functionality. Pavel has this /dev/rtc thing
to set up an alarm (not sure how functional it is) - would it be
possible to have it as a "suspend for 10 seconds then resume" debug
functionality? That way any suspend breakage would be detectable (and
bisectable) in automated testing - if the resume does not come back
after 10-20 seconds then the test failed.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-02 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-01 23:32 [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device() Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 13:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 16:41 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-02 16:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 23:29 ` [RFC][PATCH] PM: Acquire device locks on suspend (was: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device()) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-05 3:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device() Alan Stern
2008-01-05 11:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in msr.c (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in mce_64.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in cpuid.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 10:52 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-01-02 12:56 ` [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 13:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 13:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-03 10:56 ` Pavel Machek
2008-01-02 14:55 ` Kay Sievers
2008-01-02 16:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 17:54 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 18:05 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 18:12 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 18:34 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 20:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 20:29 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 17:26 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 20:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-12 0:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 0:49 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 0:56 ` Greg KH
2008-01-12 3:11 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-12 3:15 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-12 3:21 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12 4:29 ` Greg KH
2008-01-12 11:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-12 11:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080102105217.GA14731@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox