public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2)
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:52:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080102105217.GA14731@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200801020032.45529.rjw@sisk.pl>


* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Some device drivers register CPU hotplug notifiers and use them to 
> destroy device objects when removing the corresponding CPUs and to 
> create these objects when adding the CPUs back.
> 
> Unfortunately, this is not the right thing to do during 
> suspend/hibernation, since in that cases the CPU hotplug notifiers are 
> called after suspending devices and before resuming them, so the 
> operations in question are carried out on the objects representing 
> suspended devices which shouldn't be unregistered behing the PM core's 
> back.  Although right now it usually doesn't lead to any practical 
> complications, it will predictably deadlock if 
> gregkh-driver-pm-acquire-device-locks-prior-to-suspending.patch is 
> applied.
> 
> The solution is to prevent drivers from removing/adding devices from 
> within CPU hotplug notifiers during suspend/hibernation using the 
> FROZEN bit in the notifier's action argument.  However, this has to be 
> done with care, since the devices objects related to the nonboot CPUs 
> that failed to go online during resume should not be present in the 
> system.  For this reason, it seems reasonable to introduce a mechanism 
> allowing drivers to ask the PM core to remove device objects 
> corresponding to suspended devices on their behalf.
> 
> The first patch in the series introduces such a mechanism.  The 
> remaining three patches modify the MSR, x86-64 MCE and cpuid drivers 
> in accordance with the above approach.

btw., it would be really, really cool if there was a scriptable way i 
could test suspend/resume functionality. Pavel has this /dev/rtc thing 
to set up an alarm (not sure how functional it is) - would it be 
possible to have it as a "suspend for 10 seconds then resume" debug 
functionality? That way any suspend breakage would be detectable (and 
bisectable) in automated testing - if the resume does not come back 
after 10-20 seconds then the test failed.

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-01-02 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-01 23:32 [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device() Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 13:33   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 16:41     ` Alan Stern
2008-01-02 16:50       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 22:05         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 23:29           ` [RFC][PATCH] PM: Acquire device locks on suspend (was: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device()) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-05  3:11           ` [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device() Alan Stern
2008-01-05 11:55             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in msr.c (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in mce_64.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-01 23:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in cpuid.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 10:52 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-01-02 12:56   ` [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 13:15     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 13:28       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-03 10:56         ` Pavel Machek
2008-01-02 14:55       ` Kay Sievers
2008-01-02 16:01         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 17:54           ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 18:05             ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 18:12               ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 18:34                 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-01-02 20:14             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 20:29               ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 17:26       ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 20:17         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-12  0:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12  0:49   ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12  0:56     ` Greg KH
2008-01-12  3:11       ` Alan Stern
2008-01-12  3:15         ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-12  3:21         ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-12  4:29         ` Greg KH
2008-01-12 11:25           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-12 11:20     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080102105217.GA14731@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox